Generalized Pairwise Correlation and method comparison: Impact assessment for JAR attributes on overall liking

Abstract In product development using JAR (Just-About-Right) scales, it is important to identify precisely, which direction of a given attribute affects hedonic scores the most. The Generalized Pairwise Correlation Method (GPCM) is a non-parametric one and it is useful to rank JAR variables according to their impact on liking. This is done using appropriate statistical tests: the McNemar’s, the Chi-square, the Conditional Fisher’s and the Williams’ t-test. As GPCM requires one-directional variables, JAR data needs to be transformed based on the dummy variable approach. GPCM gives those attributes in that order, which should be increased/decreased to gain higher consumer liking scores. An order can be created according to the impact on liking, which order determines the development of product attributes, as well. The non-parametric tests incorporated in the method are able to identify smaller differences than other statistical methods. As a result, GPCM identifies more significant product attributes; hence, it can help product development processes even if other methods cannot.

[1]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Statistical penalty analysis , 2014 .

[2]  L. Chung,et al.  Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural consumer acceptability of Bulgogi (Korean traditional barbecued beef). , 2011, Journal of food science.

[3]  Han van de Waterbeemd,et al.  Chemometric methods in molecular design , 1995 .

[4]  Lori Rothman,et al.  Just-About-Right (JAR) Scales: Design, Usage, Benefits, and Risks , 2009 .

[5]  R. Cadena,et al.  Ideal and relative sweetness of high intensity sweeteners in mango nectar , 2012 .

[6]  R. Popper,et al.  The effect of attribute questions on overall liking ratings , 2004 .

[7]  J. E. Paton,et al.  Prediction of consumer liking from trained sensory panel information: Evaluation of neural networks , 2007 .

[8]  D. Kilcast,et al.  Sensory quality control for taint prevention , 2010 .

[9]  Howard R. Moskowitz,et al.  THE JUST‐ABOUT‐RIGHT INTENSITY SCALE: FUNCTIONAL ANALYSES AND RELATION TO HEDONICS , 2007 .

[10]  Edgar Chambers,et al.  Hedonic scales are a better predictor than just-about-right scales of optimal sweetness in lemonade , 1998 .

[11]  J. Delwiche,et al.  Impact of Label Information on Consumer Assessment of Soy-enhanced Tomato Juice , 2006 .

[12]  J. Meullenet,et al.  A PLS dummy variable approach to assess the impact of jar attributes on liking , 2006 .

[13]  D. Freitas,et al.  Ideal sweetness of mixed juices from Amazon fruits , 2013 .

[14]  Herbert Stone,et al.  Sensory Evaluation Practices , 1985 .

[15]  Patricia Stefanowicz,et al.  Sensory evaluation of food principles and practices , 2013 .

[16]  Rui Xiong,et al.  APPLICATION OF MULTIVARIATE ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES (MARS) TO THE PREFERENCE MAPPING OF CHEESE STICKS , 2004 .

[17]  K. Héberger,et al.  Generalization of pair correlation method (PCM) for non‐parametric variable selection , 2002 .

[18]  K Héberger,et al.  Variable selection using pair-correlation method. Environmental applications , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[19]  Dave Plaehn,et al.  A regression-based approach for testing significance of just-about-right variable penalties , 2008 .

[20]  A. Gordon,et al.  Comparison of consumer perception and acceptability for steaks cooked to different endpoints: validation of photographic approach. , 2013, Food chemistry.

[21]  J. Meullenet,et al.  Applying a Mixture Design for Consumer Optimization of Black Cherry, Concord Grape and Pomegranate Juice Blends , 2013 .

[22]  Károly Héberger,et al.  Conditional Fisher's exact test as a selection criterion for pair-correlation method. Type I and Type II errors , 2001 .

[23]  Dave Plaehn What’s the real penalty in penalty analysis? , 2013 .

[24]  H. Macfie,et al.  Effect of question order on sensory perception and preference in central location trials , 1997 .

[25]  E. Esmerino,et al.  The influence of sweeteners in probiotic Petit Suisse cheese in concentrations equivalent to that of sucrose. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science , 2010 .

[27]  H. Feng,et al.  Evaluation of the nutraceutical, physiochemical and sensory properties of raisin jam. , 2012, Journal of food science.

[28]  K. Héberger,et al.  Discrimination of mineral waters by electronic tongue, sensory evaluation and chemical analysis. , 2012, Food chemistry.