Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Methods: An International Comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore

This paper reports reactions to employee selection methods in the Netherlands and compares these findings internationally against six other previously published samples covering the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore. A sample of 167 participants rated 10 popular assessment techniques using a translated version of Steiner and Gilliland's measure. In common with other country samples, we found that the most popular methods among applicants were interviews, work sample tests, and resumes. Least popular methods were graphology, personal contacts, and honesty and integrity tests. Generally, method favorability was found to be highly similar to the US and other published studies internationally. Across the six countries mean process favorability correlated at .87 and mean cross-national procedural justice correlated .68. Process dimension ratings correlated at between .79 and .97 between the United States and the Netherlands. Only medium effect size differences (Cohen's d) were found between Dutch and US reactions to resumes and personality tests, the former being more favorably rated in the United States (d=.62) and the latter being more positively rated in the Netherlands (d=−.76). Implications for the design of selection procedures are discussed, especially implications for likely similarities and differences in applicant reactions internationally.

[1]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Cognitive and GMA Testing in the European Community: Issues and Evidence , 2002 .

[2]  Neil Anderson,et al.  INTERNATIONAL VALIDITY GENERALIZATION OF GMA AND COGNITIVE ABILITIES: A EUROPEAN COMMUNITY META-ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[3]  Heinz Schuler,et al.  Social validity of selection situations: A concept and some empirical results. , 1993 .

[4]  T. Judge,et al.  Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Greece: The Role of Core Self-Evaluations , 2007 .

[5]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future , 2000 .

[6]  David E. Smith,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTs' REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT CENTER , 1994 .

[7]  Arne Evers,et al.  The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection , 2005 .

[8]  S. Rynes,et al.  Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures , 1993 .

[9]  Deniz S. Ones,et al.  Recruitment and selection: Applicant perspectives and outcomes , 2001 .

[10]  The Status of Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Tests and its Implications for Managers , 1999 .

[11]  S. Gully,et al.  Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in Singapore and the United States , 2002 .

[12]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  AN INTERNATIONAL LOOK AT SELECTION PRACTICES: NATION AND CULTURE AS EXPLANATIONS FOR VARIABILITY IN PRACTICE , 1999 .

[13]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[14]  S. Gilliland,et al.  Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States , 1996 .

[15]  Sue Newell,et al.  European Management Selection Methods: A Comparison of Five Countries , 1994 .

[16]  A. Ryan,et al.  Relevance and Rigor in Research on the Applicant's Perspective: In Pursuit of Pragmatic Science , 2008 .

[17]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Validity of General Mental Ability for the Prediction of Job Performance and Training Success in Germany: A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[18]  M. A. Campion,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS) , 2001 .

[19]  R. Bhagat.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[20]  N. Anderson,et al.  Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology , 2001 .

[21]  S. Gilliland.  The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective , 1993 .

[22]  N. Anderson.  Relationships between practice and research in personnel selection: Does the left hand know what the right is doing? , 2005 .

[23]  Peter Herriot,et al.  Social Identities and Applicant Reactions , 2004 .

[24]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[25]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  J. Salgado,et al.  Validity generalization of GMA tests across countries in the European Community , 2003 .

[27]  Hk. Thierry,et al.  Handbook of work and organizational psychology. Volume 4 : Organizational psychology , 1998 .

[28]  Deléne Visser,et al.  Black and White Employees' Fairness Perceptions of Personnel Selection Techniques , 2000 .

[29]  C. Vandenberghe,et al.  Les réactions des candidats envers les techniques de sélection du personnel : une étude dans un contexte francophone , 1999 .

[30]  John P. Hausknecht,et al.  Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[31]  James L. Farr,et al.  Personnel selection and assessment : individual and organizational perspectives , 1993 .

[32]  R. Roe,et al.  Selection in Europe: Context, developments and research agenda , 2003 .

[33]  James W. Smither,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES , 2006 .

[34]  Dirk D. Steiner,et al.  Procedural Justice in Personnel Selection: International and Cross‐Cultural Perspectives , 2001 .

[35]  J. Salgado,et al.  Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Spain and Portugal , 2004 .

[36]  N. Anderson.  Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research , 2003 .

[37]  Deléne Visser,et al.  Organisational justice rules as determinants of black and white employees' fairness perceptions of personnel selection techniques , 2000 .

[38]  Neil Anderson,et al.  A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  An Agenda for Future Research on Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: A Construct-Oriented Approach , 2004 .

[40]  Neil Anderson,et al.  The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis , 2005 .

[41]  David Chan,et al.  EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE SURVEYS IN A MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION: CONSIDERING LANGUAGE AND CULTURE IN ASSESSING MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE , 1999 .

[42]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1990 .

[43]  D. D. Steiner,et al.  Fairness Reactions to Selection Methods: An Italian Study , 2007 .

[44]  THE SELECTION PROCESS , 2001 .

[45]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[46]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Editorial - The Dark Side of the Moon: Applicant Perspectives, Negative Psychological Effects (NPEs), and Candidate Decision Making in Selection , 2004 .

[47]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[48]  S. Gilliland,et al.  Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. , 1994 .