Benchmarking undedicated cloud computing providers for analysis of genomic datasets

A major bottleneck in biological discovery is now emerging at the computational level. Cloud computing offers a dynamic means whereby small and medium-sized laboratories can rapidly adjust their computational capacity. We benchmarked two established cloud computing services, Amazon Web Services Elastic MapReduce (EMR) on Amazon EC2 instances and Google Compute Engine (GCE), using publicly available genomic datasets (E.coli CC102 strain and a Han Chinese male genome) and a standard bioinformatic pipeline on a Hadoop-based platform. Wall-clock time for complete assembly differed by 52.9% (95%CI: 27.5-78.2) for E.coli and 53.5% (95%CI: 34.4-72.6) for human genome, with GCE being more efficient than EMR. The cost of running this experiment on EMR and GCE differed significantly, with the costs on EMR being 257.3% (95%CI: 211.5-303.1) and 173.9% (95%CI: 134.6-213.1) more expensive for E.coli and human assemblies respectively. Thus, GCE was found to outperform EMR both in terms of cost and wall-clock time. Our findings confirm that cloud computing is an efficient and potentially cost-effective alternative for analysis of large genomic datasets. In addition to releasing our cost-effectiveness comparison, we present available ready-to-use scripts for establishing Hadoop instances with Ganglia monitoring on EC2 or GCE.

[1]  Vivien Marx.  Genomics in the clouds , 2013, Nature Methods.

[2]  Rob Patro,et al.  Sailfish enables alignment-free isoform quantification from RNA-seq reads using lightweight algorithms , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  D. Parkhomchuk,et al.  Use of high throughput sequencing to observe genome dynamics at a single cell level , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Peter J. Tonellato,et al.  Biomedical Cloud Computing With Amazon Web Services , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  G. Nolan,et al.  Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  Samuel V. Angiuoli,et al.  Resources and Costs for Microbial Sequence Analysis Evaluated Using Virtual Machines and Cloud Computing , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  Michael C. Schatz,et al.  Cloud Computing and the DNA Data Race , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  V. Marx.  Biology: The big challenges of big data , 2013, Nature.

[9]  L. Stein.  The case for cloud computing in genome informatics , 2010, Genome Biology.

[10]  Jorge-Arnulfo Quiané-Ruiz,et al.  Runtime measurements in the cloud , 2010, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[11]  David E. Culler,et al.  The ganglia distributed monitoring system: design, implementation, and experience , 2004, Parallel Comput..

[12]  Dawei Li,et al.  The diploid genome sequence of an Asian individual , 2008, Nature.

[13]  M. Schatz,et al.  Searching for SNPs with cloud computing , 2009, Genome Biology.

[14]  Nadia Drake,et al.  Cloud computing beckons scientists , 2014, Nature.

[15]  John Chilton,et al.  Implementation of Cloud based Next Generation Sequencing data analysis in a clinical laboratory , 2013, BMC Research Notes.