The elasticity and rigidity of the outer coats of the eye

Aims: The aim of this study was to measure the elastic moduli of the cornea and sclera and the rigidity of the eyeball. Methods: Elastic moduli of the cornea and sclera were measured on 22 fresh intact porcine eyes using the relationship between elasticity and changes in pressure and volume applicable to pressure vessel models. Rigidity was determined from the relationship between changes in volume and intraocular pressure (IOP). Induced volume changes were up to 300 μl and within the physiological range of IOP (12–25 mm Hg). IOP readings taken with a transducer were used in calculations. Tonometric values were taken for comparison. Results: For cornea and sclera, the relationship between circumferential stress and volumetric strain (which defines the elastic modulus) was closely approximated to linear (R2 = 0.96), but better fitted with a second order polynomial (R2 = 1.00). Elastic moduli ranged from 0.05 to 0.24 MPa and 0.15 to 0.83 MPa for the cornea and sclera, respectively. The mean value of ocular rigidity was found to be 0.0024. The effect of increasing IOP on the average corneal radius of curvature was not statistically significant, but it altered the scleral radius of curvature by 0.07 mm/mmHg. Conclusion: The elasticity of the porcine cornea and sclera could be approximated to constant over the physiological range, but showed a tendency to non-linearity. The modulus of elasticity for the sclera is 3 to 3.5 times that of the cornea. The cornea is more resistant than the sclera to IOP changes within the physiological range.

[1]  Kevin Anderson,et al.  Application of structural analysis to the mechanical behaviour of the cornea , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  David W. A. Rees.  Basic Solid Mechanics , 1997 .

[3]  A. Fercher,et al.  Eye elongation during accommodation in humans: differences between emmetropes and myopes. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  W. A. Schlegel,et al.  Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. , 1972, Experimental eye research.

[5]  J. Ytteborg.  FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING SIZE OF RIGIDITY COEFFICIENT , 1960, Acta ophthalmologica.

[6]  H. Kasprzak,et al.  Corneal shape change during accommodation , 2001, Eye.

[7]  G. W. Nyquist,et al.  Rheology of the cornea: experimental techniques and results. , 1968, Experimental eye research.

[8]  B K Pierscionek,et al.  Fluctuations in intraocular pressure and the potential effect on aberrations of the eye , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[9]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[10]  B K Pierscionek,et al.  The effect of changing intraocular pressure on the corneal and scleral curvatures in the fresh porcine eye , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[11]  M. Langham,et al.  MANOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE PRESSURE–VOLUME RELATIONSHIP IN LIVING AND ENUCLEATED EYES OF INDIVIDUAL HUMAN SUBJECTS*† , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  P. Greene.  Mechanical Considerations in Myopia: Relative Effects of Accommodation, Convergence, Intraocular Pressure, and the Extraocular Muscles , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[13]  Jonas S. Friedenwald,et al.  Contribution to the Theory and Practice of Tonometry , 1937 .

[14]  R. Birngruber,et al.  Thermal and Biomechanical Parameters of Porcine Cornea , 2000, Cornea.

[15]  D. Mutti,et al.  The Effect of Accommodation on Ocular Shape , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  P. Purslow,et al.  Ocular elasticity. Is engineering stiffness a more useful characterization parameter than ocular rigidity? , 1996, Ophthalmology.