Pay for Percentile

We propose an incentive pay scheme for educators that links educator compensation to the ranks of their students within appropriately defined comparison sets, and we show that under certain conditions our scheme induces teachers to allocate socially optimal levels of effort to all students. Because this scheme employs only ordinal information, our scheme allows education authorities to employ completely new assessments at each testing date without ever having to equate various assessment forms. This approach removes incentives for teachers to teach to a particular assessment form and eliminates opportunities to influence reward pay by corrupting the equating process or the scales used to report assessment results. Our system links compensation to the outcomes of properly seeded contests rather than cardinal measures of achievement growth. Thus, education authorities can employ our incentive scheme for educators while employing a separate system for measuring growth in student achievement that involves no stakes for educators. This approach does not create direct incentives for educators to take actions that contaminate the measurement of student progress.

[1]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change* , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[2]  Robert E. Schiller,et al.  TO: Illinois State Board of Education , 2003 .

[3]  Dale Ballou,et al.  Test Scaling and Value-Added Measurement , 2009, Education Finance and Policy.

[4]  Unimodality of differences , 1983 .

[5]  Gabriele K. Lünser,et al.  On the Competition of Asymmetric Agents , 2008 .

[6]  Helen F. Ladd The Dallas School Accountability and Incentive Program: An Evaluation of its Impacts on Student Outcomes , 1996 .

[7]  E. Lazear,et al.  Educational Production , 1999 .

[8]  Damian W. Betebenner Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Student Growth. , 2009 .

[9]  H. Carmichael,et al.  The Agent-Agents Problem: Payment by Relative Output , 1983, Journal of Labor Economics.

[10]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us , 2000 .

[11]  Nancy L. Stokey,et al.  A Comparison of Tournaments and Contracts , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Barry Nalebuff,et al.  Prices and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Competition , 1983 .

[13]  Victor Lavy Evaluating the Effect of Teachers’ Group Performance Incentives on Pupil Achievement , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  G. Kingsbury,et al.  The Proficiency Illusion. , 2007 .

[15]  Simon Burgess,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Performance-related Pay for Teachers in England , 2009 .

[16]  Victor Lavy Performance Pay and Teachers' Effort, Productivity and Grading Ethics , 2004 .

[17]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation , 2010, Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society.

[18]  Derek A. Neal,et al.  The Design of Performance Pay in Education , 2011 .

[19]  Frederick M. Hess,et al.  Keeping an Eye on State Standards: A Race to the Bottom?. , 2006 .

[20]  Jacob L. Vigdor Teacher Salary Bonuses in North Carolina , 2008 .

[21]  Shameem Nyla NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION , 2004 .

[22]  Xuming He,et al.  Conditional growth charts , 2006 .

[23]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Economic Contests: Comparative Reward Schemes , 1984, Journal of Labor Economics.

[24]  S. Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Test-Based Accountability in Education , 2002 .

[25]  E. Lazear,et al.  Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Sudipto Bhattacharya,et al.  Heterogeneity, Tournaments, and Hierarchies , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  D. Koretz Limitations in the Use of Achievement Tests as Measures of Educators' Productivity , 2002 .

[28]  Victor Lavy Evaluating the Effect of Teachers' Performance Incentives on Pupil Achievement , 2001 .

[29]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard in Teams , 1982 .

[30]  Derek C. Briggs,et al.  Title: Is Growth in Student Achievement Scale Dependent? , 2009 .

[31]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[32]  Edward Vytlacil,et al.  On Policies to Reward the Value Added by Educators , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[33]  James M. Malcomson,et al.  Work Incentives, Hierarchy, and Internal Labor Markets , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  Derek A. Neal Aiming for Efficiency Rather than Proficiency , 2010 .

[35]  G. Baker Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  Daniel Koretz,et al.  The Validity of Gains in Scores on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). , 1998 .