Research on the Oral Proficiency Interview: Analysis, Synthesis, and Future Directions

Abstract: Since their initial publication in 1982, the ACTFL Guidelines and oral proficiency interview (OPI) have enjoyed widespread use by foreign language educators. They have also been the target of much criticism by researchers of second language acquisition and testing. Much of this criticism has focused on validity claims for the OPI. Other research (e.g., Thompson, 1995) has investigated the interrater reliability of the test. This article provides an overview of research (both critical analyses and empirical studies) conducted on the ACTFL OPI and Guidelines from 1990 to present. The author identifies trends in this research, discusses lessons learned from research in other proficiency test areas, and provides recommendations for areas of future study.

[1]  A Study of Interrater Reliability of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview in Five European Languages: Data from ESL, French, German, Russian, and Spanish. , 1995 .

[2]  S. Ross.  Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interviews , 1992 .

[3]  Marysia Johnson,et al.  Interaction In The Oral Proficiency Interview: Problems Of Validity , 2000 .

[4]  Karen E. Breiner-Sanders,et al.  ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines—Speaking: Revised 1999 , 2000 .

[5]  Gene B. Halleck,et al.  Assessing Oral Proficiency: A Comparison of Holistic and Objective Measures. , 1995 .

[6]  Davis Doherty.  Formulae and Inter-Viewer Variation in Oral Proficiency Interview Discourse. , 1996 .

[7]  Proficiency Testing and the Schools. , 1991 .

[8]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  The Discourse of Accommodation in Oral Proficiency Interviews , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[9]  Rafael Salaberry,et al.  Revising the revised format of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview , 2000 .

[10]  Anne Lazaraton,et al.  Interlocutor support in oral proficiency interviews: the case of CASE , 1996 .

[11]  Grant Henning,et al.  An Investigation of the Construct Validity of the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and Oral Interview Procedure , 1990 .

[12]  Anne Lazaraton,et al.  Preference Organization in Oral Proficiency Interviews: The Case of Language Ability Assessments , 1997 .

[13]  Language Testing Priorities: A Different Perspective. , 1990 .

[14]  R. Meredith.  The Oral Proficiency Interview in Real Life: Sharpening the Scale. , 1990 .

[15]  Dorry M. Kenyon,et al.  Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview , 1992 .

[16]  Judith E. Liskin-Gasparro,et al.  Circumlocution, communication strategies and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines: an analysis of student discourse , 1996 .

[17]  G. Halleck.  The Oral Proficiency Interview: Discrete Point Test or a Measure of Communicative Language Ability? , 1992 .

[18]  Barry O'Sullivan,et al.  Exploring Gender and Oral Proficiency Interview Performance. , 2000 .