Evaluation of novel precision viticulture tool for canopy biomass estimation and missing plant detection based on 2.5D and 3D approaches using RGB images acquired by UAV platform

Background The knowledge of vine vegetative status within a vineyard plays a key role in canopy management in order to achieve a correct vine balance and reach the final desired yield/quality. Detailed information about canopy architecture and missing plants distribution provides useful support for farmers/winegrowers to optimize canopy management practices and the replanting process, respectively. In the last decade, there has been a progressive diffusion of UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) technologies for Precision Viticulture purposes, as fast and accurate methodologies for spatial variability of geometric plant parameters. The aim of this study was to implement an unsupervised and integrated procedure of biomass estimation and missing plants detection, using both the 2.5D-surface and 3D-alphashape methods. Results Both methods showed good overall accuracy respect to ground truth biomass measurements with high values of R 2 (0.71 and 0.80 for 2.5D and 3D, respectively). The 2.5D method led to an overestimation since it is derived by considering the vine as rectangular cuboid form. On the contrary, the 3D method provided more accurate results as a consequence of the alphashape algorithm, which is capable to detect each single shoot and holes within the canopy. Regarding the missing plants detection, the 3D approach confirmed better performance in cases of hidden conditions by shoots of adjacent plants or sparse canopy with some empty spaces along the row, where the 2.5D method based on the length of section of the row with lower thickness than the threshold used (0.10 m), tended to return false negatives and false positives, respectively. Conclusions This paper describes a rapid and objective tool for the farmer to promptly identify canopy management strategies and drive replanting decisions. The 3D approach provided results closer to real canopy volume and higher performance in missing plant detection. However, the dense cloud based analysis required more processing time. In a future perspective, given the continuous technological evolution in terms of computing performance, the overcoming of the current limit represented by the pre- and post-processing phases of the large image dataset should mainstream this methodology.

[1]  Justine E. Vanden Heuvel,et al.  Palissage Reduces Cluster Zone Lateral Shoots Compared to Hedging , 2018, Catalyst: Discovery into Practice.

[2]  Jorge Torres-Sánchez,et al.  3-D Characterization of Vineyards Using a Novel UAV Imagery-Based OBIA Procedure for Precision Viticulture Applications , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Angela Ribeiro,et al.  3D monitoring of woody crops using an unmanned ground vehicle , 2017 .

[4]  Luís Pádua,et al.  Individual Grapevine Analysis in a Multi-Temporal Context Using UAV-Based Multi-Sensor Imagery , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Albert Rango,et al.  Multispectral Remote Sensing from Unmanned Aircraft: Image Processing Workflows and Applications for Rangeland Environments , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Nicola Puletti,et al.  Unsupervised classification of very high remotely sensed images for grapevine rows detection , 2014 .

[7]  Andrea Berton,et al.  Assessment of a canopy height model (CHM) in a vineyard using UAV-based multispectral imaging , 2017 .

[8]  F. López-Granados,et al.  Multi-temporal mapping of the vegetation fraction in early-season wheat fields using images from UAV , 2014 .

[9]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[10]  Matthew Bardeen,et al.  Detection and Segmentation of Vine Canopy in Ultra-High Spatial Resolution RGB Imagery Obtained from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV): A Case Study in a Commercial Vineyard , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Jorge Torres-Sánchez,et al.  Classification of 3D Point Clouds Using Color Vegetation Indices for Precision Viticulture and Digitizing Applications , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Raul Morais,et al.  Multi-Temporal Vineyard Monitoring through UAV-Based RGB Imagery , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Alessandro Matese,et al.  Practical Applications of a Multisensor UAV Platform Based on Multispectral, Thermal and RGB High Resolution Images in Precision Viticulture , 2018, Agriculture.

[14]  S. Camposeo,et al.  Comparison of UAV Photogrammetry and 3D Modeling Techniques with Other Currently Used Methods for Estimation of the Tree Row Volume of a Super-High-Density Olive Orchard , 2019, Agriculture.

[15]  Adam J. Mathews,et al.  Visualizing and Quantifying Vineyard Canopy LAI Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Collected High Density Structure from Motion Point Cloud , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Simon Bennertz,et al.  Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[17]  Simon Bennertz,et al.  Estimating Biomass of Barley Using Crop Surface Models (CSMs) Derived from UAV-Based RGB Imaging , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Paolo Cinat,et al.  Comparison of Unsupervised Algorithms for Vineyard Canopy Segmentation from UAV Multispectral Images , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Updating residual stem volume estimates using ALS- and UAV-acquired stereo-photogrammetric point clouds , 2017 .

[20]  Jorge Torres-Sánchez,et al.  High-Throughput 3-D Monitoring of Agricultural-Tree Plantations with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Technology , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Lorenzo Comba,et al.  Unsupervised detection of vineyards by 3D point-cloud UAV photogrammetry for precision agriculture , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[22]  Luís Pádua,et al.  UAS, sensors, and data processing in agroforestry: a review towards practical applications , 2017 .

[23]  Miguel Ángel Moreno,et al.  Characterization of Vitis vinifera L. Canopy Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Techniques , 2015, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[24]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Using 3D Point Clouds Derived from UAV RGB Imagery to Describe Vineyard 3D Macro-Structure , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  An Assessment of the Repeatability of Automatic Forest Inventory Metrics Derived From UAV-Borne Laser Scanning Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  Cristina Tortia,et al.  2D and 3D data fusion for crop monitoring in precision agriculture , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor).

[27]  Alessandro Matese,et al.  Methods to compare the spatial variability of UAV-based spectral and geometric information with ground autocorrelated data. A case of study for precision viticulture , 2019, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[28]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1992, VVS.