Functions of Electronic Monitoring: I to W

This chapter adopts the ‘Nagel’-approach that was introduced in Chapter 1 and it explores, in an alphabetical order, twelve different functions of electronic monitoring: the action function, automation, behavioural control, cost reduction, crime control, decarceration, degradation, detection, deterrence, harm reduction, hard treatment and humanization.

[1]  Dan Kaminski,et al.  Elektronisch toezicht in België. Een schijnbaar penitentiair ontstoppingsmiddel , 2007 .

[2]  Erving Goffman,et al.  Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates , 1961 .

[3]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  Critique: No soul in the new machine: Technofallacies in the electronic monitoring movement , 1991 .

[4]  Paul E. Ceruzzi,et al.  A history of modern computing , 1999 .

[5]  Anthea Hucklesby,et al.  Understanding Offenders' Compliance: A Case Study of Electronically Monitored Curfew Orders , 2009 .

[6]  F. McNeill.  Pervasive Punishment , 2018 .

[7]  Edna Erez,et al.  Victim-centric diversion? The electronic monitoring of domestic violence cases. , 2005, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[8]  J. Bonta,et al.  Can Electronic Monitoring Make a Difference? An Evaluation of Three Canadian Programs , 2000 .

[9]  Edna Erez,et al.  Making Your Home a Shelter: Electronic Monitoring and Victim Re-entry in Domestic Violence Cases , 2007 .

[10]  Ioan Durnescu.  Pains of Probation: Effective Practice and Human Rights , 2011, International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology.

[11]  A. Hucklesby.  A Complicated Business: The Operational Realities of Privatised Electronic Monitoring of Offenders , 2018 .

[12]  M. Nellis.  Understanding the electronic monitoring of offenders in Europe: expansion, regulation and prospects , 2014 .

[13]  R. Schwitzgebel,et al.  A program of research in behavioral electronics. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[14]  Robert M. Bohm.  “McJustice”: On the McDonaldization of Criminal Justice , 2006 .

[15]  K. Beyens,et al.  Electronic Monitoring in Belgium: A Penological Analysis of Current and Future Orientations , 2013 .

[16]  T. Gabor,et al.  Living in the Shadow of Prison Lessons from the Canadian Experience in Decarceration , 2004 .

[17]  R. Gainey,et al.  A Qualitative Assessment of the Pains Experienced on Electronic Monitoring , 1998 .

[18]  T. Beken.  Van vette vis tot dieetpil: vijftien jaar elektronisch toezicht in België , 2013 .

[19]  Luc Robert,et al.  Onder elektronisch toezicht gestelden aan het woord: krachtlijnen uit het eerste Belgische onderzoek , 2009 .

[20]  Jr. John J. DiIulio.  Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime , 1995 .

[21]  Harold Garfinkel,et al.  Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies , 1956, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Mike Nellis,et al.  Electronically monitoring offenders as “coercive connectivity” , 2018 .

[23]  D. Hayes.  The impact of supervision on the pains of community penalties in England and Wales: An exploratory study , 2015 .

[24]  A. Coyle.  PRISON ON TRIAL , 1993 .

[25]  Craig Paterson.  Tagging re-booted! Imagining the potential of victim-oriented electronic monitoring , 2017 .

[26]  J. T. Sellin,et al.  Slavery and the Penal System , 1977 .

[27]  L. Robert,et al.  Crime, criminal justice and criminology in Belgium , 2013 .

[28]  P. Hert,et al.  Out of the Ashes. Reparations for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations , 2008 .

[29]  S. Vandevelde,et al.  Punishment at home: Offenders’ experiences with electronic monitoring , 2014 .

[30]  N. Carr,et al.  Picturing probation: Exploring the utility of visual methods in comparative research , 2015 .

[31]  K. Beyens.  Elektronisch toezicht. Een oplossing voor de Belgische strafrechtsbedeling , 1996 .

[32]  James Q. Whitman.  Harsh Justice. Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide Between America and Europe (Günther Kaiser) , 2003 .

[33]  Gwen Robinson.  Delivering McJustice? The probation factory at the Magistrates’ court , 2018, Criminology & Criminal Justice.

[34]  D. Hunter,et al.  Technological Incarceration and the End of the Prison Crisis , 2017 .

[35]  M. Nellis,et al.  Electronic monitoring and probation in Sweden and England and Wales , 2013 .

[36]  Silviu Gabriel Barbu,et al.  SHORT COMMENTARY ON THE RECOMMENDATION CM/REC(2010)1 OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS TO MEMBER STATES ON THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE PROBATION RULES 1 , 2010 .

[37]  M. Deflem,et al.  Profit and Penality: An Analysis of the Corrections-Commercial Complex , 1996 .

[38]  M. Feeley.  Entrepreneurs of punishment , 2002 .

[39]  J. Bentham.  An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation , 1945, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[40]  Electronic jails: A new criminal justice concern , 1985 .

[41]  James Austin,et al.  NCCD Research Review : Wider, Stronger, and Different Nets: the Dialectics of Criminal Justice Reform , 1981 .

[42]  J. A. Nellis.  The limits of techno- utopianism: electronic monitoring in the United States of America , 2013 .

[43]  Mike Nellis,et al.  Electronic monitoring in Europe: report from the 8th CEP electronic monitoring conference , 2012 .

[44]  M. Boone,et al.  Creativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five European jurisdictions , 2016 .

[45]  Stanley H. Cohen,et al.  The punitive city: Notes on the dispersal of social control , 1979 .

[46]  Gwen Robinson.  The Cinderella complex: Punishment, society and community sanctions , 2016 .