Performance estimation of photovoltaic module under partial shading based on explicit analytical model

Abstract The conventional approach to modeling a typical photovoltaic (PV) module under partial shading conditions is based on the equivalent circuit model, which provides the current–voltage (I–V) relationship in an implicit form. In this study, a novel method based on an explicit analytical model is proposed for estimating the performance of a PV module under partial shading conditions. An explicit expression of voltage in terms of current is derived from the implicit I–V expression of the single-diode model for a single PV cell under different environmental conditions. The model is then extrapolated to a submodule under partial shading conditions, and finally, to a PV module. Using the proposed method, the I–V curve and maximum power of a PV module are calculated analytically and accurately under different partial shading conditions. Owing to the explicitness of the proposed method, the computational complexity and time required are significantly less than Newton’s method and Lambert W function method with similar accuracy. The proposed method is verified via outdoor experiments under different partial shading conditions. The results show satisfactory agreement between the estimated and measured I–V curves and between the P–V curves and the maximum power. The proposed method is accurate and particularly effective for determining the actual performance of PV modules under partial shading conditions, and is thus scalable for direct online applications.

[1]  A. Das An explicit J–V model of a solar cell using equivalent rational function form for simple estimation of maximum power point voltage , 2013 .

[2]  Yunpeng Zhang,et al.  Prediction of I-V characteristics for a PV panel by combining single diode model and explicit analytical model , 2017 .

[3]  K. Naito,et al.  Simulation of I–V characteristics of a PV module with shaded PV cells , 2003 .

[4]  Efstratios I. Batzelis,et al.  Direct MPP Calculation in Terms of the Single-Diode PV Model Parameters , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[5]  A. Laudani,et al.  Identification of the one-diode model for photovoltaic modules from datasheet values , 2014 .

[6]  E. Muljadi,et al.  A cell-to-module-to-array detailed model for photovoltaic panels , 2012 .

[7]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Partial shadowing of photovoltaic arrays with different system configurations: literature review and field test results , 2003 .

[8]  Rodrigo Correa,et al.  Mismatched Series–Parallel Photovoltaic Generator Modeling: An Implicit Current–Voltage Approach , 2019, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[9]  M. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  A MATLAB based PV Module Models analysis under Conditions of Nonuniform Irradiance , 2017 .

[10]  Carlos Andrés Ramos-Paja,et al.  A technique for mismatched PV array simulation , 2013 .

[11]  Seddik Bacha,et al.  Forecasting photovoltaic array power production subject to mismatch losses , 2010 .

[12]  A. Das Analytical derivation of explicit J–V model of a solar cell from physics based implicit model , 2012 .

[13]  J. W. Bishop Computer simulation of the effects of electrical mismatches in photovoltaic cell interconnection circuits , 1988 .

[14]  Guangyu Liu,et al.  A general modeling method for I–V characteristics of geometrically and electrically configured photovoltaic arrays , 2011 .

[16]  Y. Al-Turki,et al.  A review on maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems with and without shading conditions , 2017 .

[17]  M. Vitelli,et al.  Analytical model of mismatched photovoltaic fields by means of Lambert W-function , 2007 .

[18]  Suresh Mikkili,et al.  Modelling and performance assessment of PV array topologies under partial shading conditions to mitigate the mismatching power losses , 2018 .

[19]  A. Das Analytical derivation of equivalent functional form of explicit J–V model of an illuminated solar cell from physics based implicit model , 2014 .

[20]  Baoqun Yin,et al.  A Salp-Swarm Optimization based MPPT technique for harvesting maximum energy from PV systems under partial shading conditions , 2020 .

[21]  K. L. Man,et al.  Global MPPT Method for Photovoltaic Systems Operating under Partial Shading Conditions using the 0.8VOC Model , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2019 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe).

[22]  A. Das An explicit J–V model of a solar cell for simple fill factor calculation , 2011 .

[23]  C. Y. Chung,et al.  Submodule-Based Modeling and Simulation of a Series-Parallel Photovoltaic Array Under Mismatch Conditions , 2017, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[24]  Daniel González-Montoya,et al.  A Solution of Implicit Model of Series-Parallel Photovoltaic Arrays by Using Deterministic and Metaheuristic Global Optimization Algorithms , 2020, Energies.

[25]  S. Silvestre,et al.  Effects of shadowing on photovoltaic module performance , 2008 .

[26]  Efstratios I. Batzelis,et al.  An Explicit PV String Model Based on the Lambert $W$ Function and Simplified MPP Expressions for Operation Under Partial Shading , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[27]  V. Quaschning,et al.  Numerical simulation of current-voltage characteristics of photovoltaic systems with shaded solar cells , 1996 .

[28]  William A. Beckman,et al.  Erratum to “Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance” [Solar Energy 80 (2006) 78–88] , 2007 .

[29]  G. Petrone,et al.  A model of photovoltaic fields in mismatching conditions featuring an improved calculation speed , 2013 .