From the Streets to the Internet: The Cyber-Diffusion of Contention

The Internet has been widely credited with sparking a revolution in everything from consumer shopping habits and the management of stock portfolios to the practice of popular democracy. It is also leaving its mark on the dynamics of popular contention. Political protest traditionally relied heavily on claims makers' gathering in the streets to contest power holders. The Internet is altering this dynamic by electronically promoting the diffusion of protest ideas and tactics efficiently and quickly across the globe. Less concerned with such constraints as time and geographic space, it has caught policymakers off guard with its ease of public accessibility and immediacy of impact. This cyber-diffusion, however, has a cautionary side: while significantly enhancing the potential for disparate individuals and groups to collectively pool resources and strategy, the Internet also holds the power to turn unreliable and unverifiable information into a global electronic riot.

[1]  Marco Giugni,et al.  The Other Side of the Coin: Explaining Crossnational Similarities Between Social Movements , 1998 .

[2]  H. Johnston,et al.  Collective Behavor and Social Movements in the Postmodern Age: Looking Backward to Look Forward , 1998 .

[3]  J. Jenkins,et al.  The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements , 1997 .

[4]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Conceptual origins, current problems, future direction , 1996 .

[5]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism , 1998, Polity.

[6]  Jeffrey M. Ayres.  Defying Conventional Wisdom: Political Movements and Popular Contention Against North American Free Trade , 1998 .

[7]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[8]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[9]  Charles Tilly,et al.  To Map Contentious Politics , 1996 .

[10]  Charles Tilly,et al.  The Contentious French , 1987 .

[11]  M. Schulz.  Collective Action across Borders: Opportunity Structures, Network Capacities, and Communicative Praxis in the Age of Advanced Globalization , 1998 .

[12]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[13]  Sidney Tarrow,et al.  Fishnets, Internets, and Catnets: Globalization and Transnational Collective Action , 1996 .

[14]  Stephen J. Kobrin,et al.  The MAI and the Clash of Globalizations , 1998 .

[15]  Thomas Risse-Kappen,et al.  Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions , 1995 .

[16]  B. Barber.  Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy , 1998 .

[17]  S. Tarrow.  Social Movements in Contentious Politics: A Review Article , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[18]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[19]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  Urban-to-Rural Diffusion of Opinions in Contemporary America , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Francesca Polletta,et al.  Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics , 1998 .

[21]  Doug McAdam,et al.  The Cross-National Diffusion of Movement Ideas , 1993 .