Development and validity of an instrumented handbike: initial results of propulsion kinetics.

OBJECTIVE To develop an instrumented handbike system to measure the forces applied to the handgrip during handbiking. DESIGN A 6 degrees of freedom force sensor was built into the handgrip of an attach-unit handbike, together with two optical encoders to measure the orientation of the handgrip and crank in space. Linearity, precision, and percent error were determined for static and dynamic tests. RESULTS High linearity was demonstrated for both the static and the dynamic condition (r=1.01). Precision was high under the static condition (standard deviation of 0.2N), however the precision decreased with higher loads during the dynamic condition. Percent error values were between 0.3 and 5.1%. CONCLUSION This is the first instrumented handbike system that can register 3-dimensional forces. It can be concluded that the instrumented handbike system allows for an accurate force analysis based on forces registered at the handle bars.

[1]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Power output and metabolic cost of synchronous and asynchronous submaximal and peak level hand cycling on a motor driven treadmill in able-bodied male subjects. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Knee flexor moments during propulsion in cycling--a creative solution to Lombard's Paradox. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  H E Veeger,et al.  Propulsion technique in hand rim wheelchair ambulation. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[4]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Alternative Modes of Manual Wheelchair Ambulation: An Overview , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[5]  Weerawat Limroongreungrat,et al.  An Instrumented Wheel System for Measuring 3-D Pushrim Kinetics During Racing Wheelchair Propulsion , 2009, Research in sports medicine.

[6]  W Mark Richter,et al.  Stroke pattern and handrim biomechanics for level and uphill wheelchair propulsion at self-selected speeds. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Christian Krämer,et al.  Effect of different handgrip angles on work distribution during hand cycling at submaximal power levels , 2009, Ergonomics.

[8]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[9]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Hand-rim wheelchair propulsion capacity during rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  M L Hull,et al.  Measurement of pedal loading in bicycling: I. Instrumentation. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Alicia M Koontz,et al.  Filter frequency selection for manual wheelchair biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey,et al.  The influence of crank length and cadence on mechanical efficiency in hand cycling , 2007, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[13]  D J J Bregman,et al.  Is effective force application in handrim wheelchair propulsion also efficient? , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  R A Cooper,et al.  Methods for determining three-dimensional wheelchair pushrim forces and moments: a technical note. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  Yves Vanlandewijck,et al.  Consistency of the within cycle torque distribution pattern during hand cycling [online]: - a pilot study , 2004 .

[16]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Preliminary outcomes of the SmartWheel Users' Group database: a proposed framework for clinicians to objectively evaluate manual wheelchair propulsion. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  R H Rozendal,et al.  Wheelchair ergonomics and physiological testing of prototypes. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[18]  V L Goosey-Tolfrey,et al.  A kinetic analysis of trained wheelchair racers during two speeds of propulsion. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  R. A. Binkhorst,et al.  Measurement of forces exerted on pedal and crank during work on a bicycle ergometer at different loads , 2004, Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie.

[20]  Petra Platen,et al.  Handbiking: Physiological Responses to Synchronous and Asynchronous Crank Montage , 2003 .

[21]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  SMART/sup Wheels/: development and testing of a system for measuring manual wheelchair propulsion dynamics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  P. Gorce,et al.  Effects of backrest positioning and gear ratio on nondisabled subjects' handcycling sprinting performance and kinematics. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  M. Boninger,et al.  Shoulder joint kinetics and pathology in manual wheelchair users. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  Han Houdijk,et al.  Influence of hand cycling on physical capacity in the rehabilitation of persons with a spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  L. A. Rozendaal,et al.  Load on the shoulder in low intensity wheelchair propulsion. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  Philippe Gorce,et al.  The effects of crank adjustments on handbike propulsion: A kinematic model approach , 2008 .

[27]  M O Ericson,et al.  The Forces of Ankle Joint Structures during Ergometer Cycling , 1985, Foot & ankle.

[28]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Biophysical aspects of submaximal hand cycling. , 2008, International journal of sports medicine.

[29]  H. E. J. Veeger,et al.  Peak Power Production in Wheelchair Propulsion , 1994 .

[30]  Philippe Gorce,et al.  A biomechanical analysis of handcycling: a case study. , 2010, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[31]  C. J. Snijders,et al.  Computer-controlled wheelchair ergometer , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[32]  Daniel Theisen,et al.  Influence of crank rate in hand cycling. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[33]  Margaret A. Finley,et al.  The biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion in individuals with and without upper-limb impairment. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  G Mukherjee,et al.  Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[35]  H E Veeger,et al.  Within-cycle characteristics of the wheelchair push in sprinting on a wheelchair ergometer. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[36]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Mechanical load on the upper extremity during wheelchair activities. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[37]  Amalendu Samanta,et al.  Effect of chronic use of different propulsion systems in wheelchair design on the aerobic capacity of Indian users. , 2005, The Indian journal of medical research.

[38]  P D Soden,et al.  Forces applied to a bicycle during normal cycling. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  K N An,et al.  An instrumented wheel for kinetic analysis of wheelchair propulsion. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  M. L. Hull,et al.  Measurement of pedal loading in bicycling , 1981 .