Gap Acceptance Behavior of Mobile Phone–Distracted Drivers at Roundabouts

The use of mobile phones while driving is increasing at an alarming rate despite the associated crash risks. A significant safety concern is that driving while distracted by a mobile phone is more prevalent among young drivers, a less experienced driving cohort with elevated crash risk. The objective of this study was to examine the gap acceptance behavior of distracted young drivers at roundabouts. The Center for Accident Research and Road Safety–Queensland Advanced Driving Simulator was used to test participants on a simulated gap acceptance scenario at roundabouts. Conflicting traffic approaching from the right of a four-legged roundabout was programmed to show a series of vehicles with the gaps between them proportionately increased from 2 s to 6 s. Thirty-two licensed young drivers drove the simulator under three phone conditions: baseline (no phone conversation), a hands-free phone conversation, and a handheld phone conversation. Results show that distracted drivers started responding to the gap acceptance scenario when they were closer to the roundabout and they approached the roundabout at slower speeds. These drivers also decelerated at faster rates to reduce their speeds before gap acceptance compared with nondistracted drivers. Although accepted gap sizes were not significantly different across phone conditions, differences in the safety margin at various gap sizes—measured by postencroachment time (PET) between the driven vehicle and the conflicting vehicle—were statistically significant across phone conditions. PETs for distracted drivers were smaller across different gap sizes and suggest that a smaller safety margin was accepted by distracted drivers compared with nondistracted drivers.

[1]  Simon Washington,et al.  Investigating Pedestrian Injury Crashes on Modern Roundabouts in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia , 2015 .

[2]  Peter T. Savolainen,et al.  Examining Statewide Public Perceptions of Roundabouts through a Web-Based Survey , 2012 .

[3]  Michael E Rakauskas,et al.  Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[4]  Volker Hargutt,et al.  Frequency and impact of hands-free telephoning while driving - results from naturalistic driving data , 2015 .

[5]  Simon Washington,et al.  Influence of road traffic environment and mobile phone distraction on the speed selection behaviour of young drivers , 2015 .

[6]  Michael Manser,et al.  The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk. , 2015, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[7]  Md. Mazharul Haque,et al.  Effects of mobile phone distraction on drivers' reaction times , 2013 .

[8]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Mobile phones and driving: a review of contemporary research , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[9]  R. Fuller,et al.  Iconography : Task difficulty and risk in the determination of driver behaviour , 2007 .

[10]  Simon Washington,et al.  Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  W Butch,et al.  COMMON MISPERCEPTIONS ABOUT MODERN ROUNDABOUTS , 2002 .

[12]  Simon Washington,et al.  A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Teena M. Garrison,et al.  Impact of Relevance and Distraction on Driving Performance and Visual Attention in a Simulated Driving Environment , 2013 .

[14]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[15]  Michael G Lenné,et al.  Driver distraction in an unusual environment: Effects of text-messaging in tunnels. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Moshe Eizenman,et al.  An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  David Shinar,et al.  To call or not to call--that is the question (while driving). , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Dot Hs,et al.  The Impact of Hand-Held And Hands-Free Cell Phone Use on Driving Performance and Safety-Critical Event Risk , 2013 .

[20]  Simon Washington,et al.  Decisions and actions of distracted drivers at the onset of yellow lights. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Chris Schmandt,et al.  Mindful navigation with guiding light: design considerations for projector based indoor navigation assistance system , 2012 .

[22]  Michael G Lenné,et al.  Look Who's Talking! A Roadside Survey of Drivers’ Cell Phone Use , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[23]  Gerald McGwin,et al.  The Prevalence of Distraction Among Passenger Vehicle Drivers: A Roadside Observational Approach , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[24]  Simon Washington,et al.  The impact of mobile phone distraction on the braking behaviour of young drivers : a hazard-based duration model , 2014 .

[25]  Andrew Parkes,et al.  HOW DANGEROUS IS DRIVING WITH A MOBILE PHONE? BENCHMARKING THE IMPAIRMENT TO ALCOHOL , 2002 .

[26]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Cell Phones and Driving: Review of Research , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[27]  Peter J Cooper,et al.  Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[28]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Driving impairs talking , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Alfonso Montella,et al.  Identifying crash contributory factors at urban roundabouts and using association rules to explore their relationships to different crash types. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.