Response to a change in the target nest during ant relocation

ABSTRACT Decisions regarding spatial and temporal choices pertaining to a wide range of activities such as mating, feeding and resting are necessary for all organisms. Social species encounter another level of complexity, wherein inputs from multiple individuals have to be consolidated to yield a consensus. One platform on which decision making can be examined is the relocation of animal societies. Relocation is the process by which organisms move from their old dwelling to a new nest along with all the inhabitants. This exposes them to the elements and thus impacts their survival and reproduction. Diacamma indicum, the model system for our experiments is a ponerine ant that uses tandem running for colony relocation. In the present study an artificial manipulation was performed to cause a shift in the target nest. The flexibility of the relocation process and, more specifically, the response of tandem leaders to a changed target were studied. A majority of these leaders (N=262) not only re-evaluated and adapted to the change, but did so with negligible error (1.65%). This enabled colonies (N=10) to reunite at the target nest in every case. The only cost to this flexible decision making was paid in terms of additional time. Although considered to be a primitive method of recruitment, we reveal that tandem running allows D. indicum leaders to incorporate assessment of the available options at every step. This inherent flexibility in decision making would be a good strategy for organisms that need to function with incomplete information or inhabit environments that change frequently. Summary: Colonies of relocating ants show remarkable flexibility in their ability to reassess and modify their response when their target nest is changed midway through relocation.

[1]  S. Pratt Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[2]  Elva J H Robinson,et al.  An agent-based model to investigate the roles of attractive and repellent pheromones in ant decision making during foraging. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Rajbir Kaur,et al.  Leaders follow leaders to reunite the colony: relocation dynamics of an Indian queenless ant in its natural habitat , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Speed–cohesion trade-offs in collective decision making in ants and the concept of precision in animal behaviour , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  M. M�glich,et al.  Tandem Calling: A New Kind of Signal in Ant Communication , 1974, Science.

[6]  S. G. Reebs Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Moving targets: collective decisions and flexible choices in house-hunting ants , 2007, Swarm Intelligence.

[8]  M. Möglich Social organization of nest emigration inLeptothorax (Hym., Form.) , 1978, Insectes Sociaux.

[9]  Better the nest site you know: decision-making during nest migrations by the Pharaoh’s ant , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  Nigel R Franks,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in decision-making ants: expediting politics and policy implementation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  R. Kaur,et al.  Coupled adult-brood transport augments relocation in the Indian queenless ant Diacamma indicum , 2014, Insectes Sociaux.

[12]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[13]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  A. Sumana,et al.  Key relocation leaders in an Indian queenless ant , 2013, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  N. Franks,et al.  Knowledgeable individuals lead collective decisions in ants , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  M. Lindauer,et al.  Communication in Swarm-Bees Searching for a New Home , 1957, Nature.

[19]  R. Gadagkar,et al.  Regulation of reproduction in a queenless ant: aggression, pheromones and reduction in conflict , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  P. Visscher Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects. , 2007, Annual review of entomology.

[21]  E. Wilson,et al.  Journey to the ants: a story of scientific exploration , 1994 .

[22]  E. Robinson,et al.  Can ant colonies choose a far-and-away better nest over an in-the-way poor one? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  W. M. Wheeler,et al.  The Mating of Diacamma , 1922 .

[24]  E. L. Franklin The journey of tandem running: the twists, turns and what we have learned , 2013, Insectes Sociaux.

[25]  P. Visscher,et al.  House-hunting by honey bee swarms: collective decisions and individual behaviors , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[26]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Psychophysics: Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy , 2003, Nature.

[27]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Decision making by small and large house-hunting ant colonies: one size fits all , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees , 2004 .

[31]  E. Wilson,et al.  The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies , 2008 .

[32]  T. Seeley,et al.  Deciding on a new home: how do honeybees agree? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.