Evolving a bi-objective optimization model for an after sales supply chain in presence of information asymmetry and service level requirement

PurposeOptimization of resources related to man, money, manpower and those related to organization is critical in context of after-sales supply chains. Many times, organizational objectives in terms of resource optimization and providing superior customer experience might be conflicting, however.Design/methodology/approachOne such instance is when customers expect near 100% service level in which case the organizational costs to meet such high service level goes up significantly. To this end, in this research a novel bi-objective optimization model has been evolved for a typical after-sales service supply chain network constituted of the manufacturer, the retailer and the customer. The first objective function pertains to maximization of the manufacturer's and the retailer's profit. The second objective function is related to the minimization of tardiness of order fulfilment (by the retailer) for the customer.FindingsEmploying a small problem instance, the authors generate a number of findings related to service level and information asymmetry. In particular, the authors observe that achieving best possible manufacturer-retailer profit and at the same time 100% service level is a mathematical impossibility. Furthermore, reducing information asymmetry between the customer and the retailer (as opposed to reducing information asymmetry between the retailer and the manufacturer) actually yields higher profits for the manufacturer-retailer pair.Originality/valueThis research describes the mathematical structure of a three-tier after-sales supply chain wherein information quality and service level requirements are key constraints. Furthermore, the study evolves the bi-objective optimization model as a formulation that can drive the operational decisions of manufacturers and retailers who are part of such after-sales service supply chains.

[1]  S. T. A. Niaki,et al.  A multiproduct single machine economic production quantity model for an imperfect production system under warehouse construction cost , 2015 .

[2]  Juan R. Trapero,et al.  Impact of Information Exchange on Supplier Forecasting Performance , 2012 .

[3]  Shib Sankar Sana An EOQ model for stochastic demand for limited capacity of own warehouse , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Make-or-buy service capacity decision in a supply chain providing after-sales service , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Sandeep Dayal,et al.  The Secret Life of Factory Service Centers: For a Lucrative New Source of Revenues, Profits, and Market Information, Manufacturers Need Look No Further Than Their Own Repair Shops , 2002 .

[6]  Paulo Sampaio,et al.  Supply chain management and quality management integration: A conceptual model proposal , 2017 .

[7]  David Gallear,et al.  Decision support for build-to-order supply chain management through multiobjective optimization , 2012 .

[8]  Pandu R. Tadikamalla,et al.  Flexible contract design for VMI supply chain with service-sensitive demand: Revenue-sharing and supplier subsidy , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Soo-Haeng Cho,et al.  Advance Selling in a Supply Chain Under Uncertain Supply and Demand , 2013, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[10]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Supply contracting and process innovation in a dynamic supply chain with information asymmetry , 2021, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Nicola Saccani,et al.  Configuring the after-sales service supply chain: A multiple case study , 2007 .

[12]  Tiaojun Xiao,et al.  Coordination of a supply chain with loss-averse consumers in service quality , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[13]  Biswajit Sarkar,et al.  A production-inventory model with probabilistic deterioration in two-echelon supply chain management , 2013 .

[14]  Yossi Aviv,et al.  On the Benefits of Collaborative Forecasting Partnerships Between Retailers and Manufacturers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[15]  M. Dresner,et al.  Beyond Information Sharing: An Empirical Analysis of Vendor‐Managed Inventory , 2014 .

[16]  Liu Yang,et al.  Optimal pricing contracts and level of information asymmetry in a supply chain , 2018, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[17]  Divesh Ojha,et al.  Is there a performance tradeoff in managing order fulfillment and the bullwhip effect in supply chains? The role of information sharing and information type , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[18]  Baozhuang Niu,et al.  Pricing and Design of After-Sales Service Contract: The Value of Mining Asymmetric Sales Cost Information , 2017, Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  A. Neely,et al.  Steering Manufacturing Firms towards Service Business Model Innovation , 2013 .

[20]  Yi Liao,et al.  Channel selection and fulfillment service contracts in the presence of asymmetric service information , 2020 .

[21]  Jan Stallaert,et al.  Supply chain management using put option contracts with information asymmetry , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[22]  Andrea Schiffauerova,et al.  Managing quality decisions in supply chain , 2019, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

[23]  Taesu Cheong,et al.  Quality improvement incentive strategies in a supply chain , 2018, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[24]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Collaborative Cost Reduction and Component Procurement under Information Asymmetry , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Heiko Gebauer,et al.  Characterizing service networks for moving from products to solutions , 2013 .

[26]  Helena Forslund,et al.  Measuring information quality in the order fulfilment process , 2007 .

[27]  Tian Li,et al.  Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer ☆ , 2015 .

[28]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Production Cost Reduction , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[29]  Qiying Hu,et al.  Interaction of after-sales service provider and contract type in a supply chain , 2017 .

[30]  G. Giacchetta,et al.  Supplier Satisfaction Survey as a management tool for reengineering the procurement process , 2013 .

[31]  Young Hae Lee,et al.  The value of information sharing in a supply chain with seasonal demand process , 2010, The 40th International Conference on Computers & Indutrial Engineering.

[32]  Albert P. M. Wagelmans,et al.  Two-echelon supply chain coordination under information asymmetry with multiple types , 2016 .

[33]  Ming Liu,et al.  Service quality coordination contracts for online shopping service supply chain with competing service providers: integrating fairness and individual rationality , 2019, Oper. Res..

[34]  Kevin R. Gue,et al.  Optimal Wave Release Times for Order Fulfillment Systems with Deadlines , 2017, Transp. Sci..

[35]  Yuling Sun,et al.  Game Theoretic Analysis of After-Sales Service in Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Warranty Sensitive Demand , 2020 .

[36]  S. Minner,et al.  A review on supply chain contracting with information considerations: information updating and information asymmetry , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..