The minority game strategy in team competition: how and when?

A team-based competitive environment is a complex multi-agent environment, in which agents are required to coordinate among each other not only to enhance their collective behavior, but also to compete with other teams. Based on the minority game (MG) model, we have provided a strategy for assisting a team to win in RoboCup and in a more general environment, i.e., DynaGrid. In this paper, we aim to examine the effectiveness of the MG-based strategy for DynaGrid in more complete situations, e.g., both regular and irregular situations. We also propose a method for measuring the irregular complexity of a dynamic environment. Thus we are able to quantitatively figure out the typical situations in which the MG strategy works. Through experimental validation, we have found: (1) the MG strategy can generally speaking help a team of agents to enhance their competitiveness in a dynamically-changing environment, e.g., the target object is in a nonlinear or irregular motion; (2) the MG strategy does not have an edge over a commonly-used greedy strategy under some specific circumstances where a learning window is not large enough.

[1]  Matteo Marsili,et al.  Modeling market mechanism with minority game , 1999, cond-mat/9909265.

[2]  Xiaolong Jin,et al.  Autonomy Oriented Computing: From Problem Solving to Complex Systems Modeling (Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations) , 2004 .

[3]  Paulsamy Muruganandam,et al.  Time series analysis for minority game simulations of financial markets , 2003 .

[4]  M. Pascual Understanding nonlinear dynamics , 1996 .

[5]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology , 2005 .

[6]  Tingting Wang,et al.  Minority game strategies in dynamic multi-agent role assignment , 2004 .

[7]  Tingting Wang,et al.  Minority game strategies in dynamic multi-agent role assignment , 2004, Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2004. (IAT 2004)..

[8]  Tingting Wang,et al.  Evaluating the Minority Game strategy in agent role assignments , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[9]  Weixiong Zhang,et al.  Towards flexible teamwork in persistent teams , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[10]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Towards Flexible Teamwork , 1997, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[11]  Gil Tidhar,et al.  Flying Together: Modelling Air Mission Teams , 1998, Applied Intelligence.

[12]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Minority games and distributed coordination in non-stationary environments , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN'02 (Cat. No.02CH37290).

[13]  Henry Hexmoor,et al.  Teams of agents , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[14]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Strongly Typed Genetic Programming in Evolving Cooperation Strategies , 1995, ICGA.

[15]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Emergence of cooperation and organization in an evolutionary game , 1997 .

[16]  N. Johnson,et al.  Minority game with arbitrary cutoffs , 1999, cond-mat/9903228.