Distance and velocity measures: using citations to determine breadth and speed of research impact

Research that integrates the social and natural sciences is vital to address many societal challenges, yet is difficult to arrange, conduct, and disseminate. This paper compares diffusion of the research supported by a unique U.S. National Science Foundation program on Human and Social Dynamics (“HSD”) with a matched group of heavily cited papers. We offer a measure of the distance of cites between the Web of Science Category (“WoSC”) in which a publication appears and the WoSC of the journal citing it, and find that HSD publications are cited more distantly than are comparison publications. We provide another measure—citation velocity—finding that HSD publications are cited with similar lag times as are the comparison papers. These basic citation distance and velocity measures enrich analyses of research knowledge diffusion patterns.

[1]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  1. A Conceptual Vocabulary of Interdisciplinary Science , 2000 .

[3]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[5]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping the backbone of science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[6]  Roseanne J. Foti.  Science of Team Science , 2012 .

[7]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research Current Experience in Policy and Performance , 1983 .

[8]  Denise Anne Caruso,et al.  LEAD, FOLLOW, GET OUT OF THE WAY: SIDESTEPPING THE BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE PRACTICE OF INTERDISCIPLINARITY A New Mechanism For Knowledge Production And Re-Integration In The Age Of Information , 2001 .

[9]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[10]  A. Porter,et al.  How interdisciplinary is a given body of research , 2008 .

[11]  Kara L. Hall,et al.  The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[12]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[13]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[14]  Laurel L. Haak,et al.  Predicting highly cited papers: A Method for Early Detection of Candidate Breakthroughs , 2014 .

[15]  Frederick A. Rossini,et al.  International Research Management , 1990 .

[16]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Frameworks for integrating interdisciplinary research , 1979 .

[17]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics program , 2013 .

[18]  S. Sarason,et al.  Crossing boundaries , 1997 .

[19]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  A forward diversity index , 2011, Scientometrics.

[20]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[21]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity , 2007, Scientometrics.

[22]  A. Stirling.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Practical research proposal and publication profiling , 2010 .

[24]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories , 2009 .

[25]  A. Porter,et al.  Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture , 2006 .