Tangible autonomous interfaces (TAIs): exploring autonomous behaviours in TUIs

The use of autonomous behaviour in Tangible User Interfaces can potentially create a compelling and new kind of interaction between humans and computers. We motivate this argument by reviewing related research, which indicates that people are engaged by apparently autonomous behaviours in tangible objects and apply rules of social behaviour towards these smart objects. Our intention is to leverage this effect in support of human-computer interaction. Rather than aiming to improve user performance, we argue that such interfaces can offer a richer and more enjoyable autonomous interface interaction. Herein we present a framework highlighting key concepts and characteristics which are important while designing and implementing Tangible Autonomous Interfaces.

[1]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Designing Usable Electronic Text: Ergonomic Aspects Of Human Information Usage , 1994 .

[2]  JOHN F. Young Machine Intelligence , 1971, Nature.

[3]  David Levy,et al.  Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships , 2008 .

[4]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[5]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[7]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[8]  Kenneth P. Fishkin,et al.  A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[9]  V. Braitenberg Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[10]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Artificial life meets entertainment: lifelike autonomous agents , 1995, CACM.

[11]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  "My Roomba Is Rambo": Intimate Home Appliances , 2007, UbiComp.

[12]  Mahadev Satyanarayanan,et al.  Pervasive computing: vision and challenges , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[13]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  Agency, tangible technology and young children , 2007, IDC.

[14]  John P. Sullins Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-robot Relationships , 2010 .

[15]  Masanori Sugimoto,et al.  RoboTable: a tabletop framework for tangible interaction with robots in a mixed reality , 2009, Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology.

[16]  Mario Romero,et al.  Tableau machine: an alien presence in the home , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence? , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[18]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The role of interactive conceptions of intelligence and life in cognitive technology , 1997, Proceedings Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology Humanizing the Information Age.

[19]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  StoryCrate: tabletop storyboarding for live film production , 2012, CHI.

[20]  Daniel Jackson,et al.  Touchbugs: actuated tangibles on multi-touch tables , 2013, CHI.

[21]  Michael Schmitz,et al.  Concepts for life-like interactive objects , 2010, TEI.

[22]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  The USUS Evaluation Framework for Human-Robot Interaction , 2009 .

[23]  Jay G. Wilpon,et al.  Voice communication between humans and machines , 1994 .

[24]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[25]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Rudiments 1, 2 & 3: design speculations on autonomy , 2010, TEI.

[26]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.