Decision Support Framework for Selecting Wearable Internet of Things Devices for Safety Management in Construction

Construction workers are usually faced with many safety and health risks due to the hazardous nature of the construction work environment. The application of emerging safety technologies such as wearable sensing devices (WSDs) and the Internet of things (IoT) has been identified as one of the most effective means of predicting future performance and preventing these risky events. In spite of the benefits of these devices, their implementation on construction sites to protect workers and improve their safety performance is still limited. Several IoT-based wearable sensing devices are being used in other industries to monitor metrics that are similar to those that can be monitored to manage workers’ safety on construction jobsites. Hence, there is a need to develop some criteria for evaluating these devices for their applications in construction. The main purpose of this study is to develop a conceptual decision-making framework that stakeholders can use to select Wearable Internet of Things (WIoT) devices for applications in construction. The research approach involves a review of literature on WIoT devices and the development of a decision-making framework using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This study presents an initial attempt geared toward providing stakeholders with an effective decision-making tool that can be used to select WIoT devices for implementation in the construction industry.

[1]  Nicola Zaccarelli,et al.  Spatial multi-criteria assessment of potential lead markets for electrified vehicles in Europe , 2012 .

[2]  Geng Yang,et al.  Wearable Internet of Things: Concept, architectural components and promises for person-centered healthcare , 2014, 2014 4th International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare - Transforming Healthcare Through Innovations in Mobile and Wireless Technologies (MOBIHEALTH).

[3]  Liang-Hong Wu,et al.  Exploring consumers' intention to accept smartwatch , 1970, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Yier Jin,et al.  Privacy and Security in Internet of Things and Wearable Devices , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems.

[5]  Sam Emaminejad,et al.  Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis , 2016, Nature.

[6]  Youngcheol Kang,et al.  Quantifying the Effectiveness of IoT Technologies for Accident Prevention , 2020 .

[7]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Leading indicators of construction safety performance , 2013 .

[8]  Ibukun Awolusi Safety Activity Analysis Framework to Evaluate Safety Performance in Construction , 2017 .

[9]  Mesut Kumru,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process application in selecting the mode of transport for a logistics company , 2014 .

[10]  Marius Jakimavičius,et al.  A GIS and multi‐criteria‐based analysisand rankingof transportation zonesof Vilniuscity , 2009 .

[11]  Ibukun Awolusi,et al.  Wearable Sensing Devices: Potential Impact & Current Use for Incident Prevention , 2020 .

[12]  Sungjoo Hwang,et al.  What drives construction workers' acceptance of wearable technologies in the workplace?: Indoor localization and wearable health devices for occupational safety and health , 2017 .

[13]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Developing a Decision-Making Framework to Select Safety Technologies for Highway Construction , 2018 .

[14]  Miguel López-Benítez,et al.  Wearable Internet of Things - from human activity tracking to clinical integration , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[15]  Reza Akhavian,et al.  Ergonomic analysis of construction worker's body postures using wearable mobile sensors. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  Keisuke Hanaki,et al.  Using grey system theory to evaluate transportation effects on air quality trends in Japan , 2007 .

[17]  Xu Shen,et al.  Construction Equipment Operator Physiological Data Assessment and Tracking , 2017 .

[18]  Muhammad Firdhaus Che Hassan,et al.  Material selection in a sustainable manufacturing practice of a badminton racket frame using Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) Method , 2018 .

[19]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Proactive Construction Safety Control: Measuring, Monitoring, and Responding to Safety Leading Indicators , 2013 .

[21]  Pratibha Rani,et al.  Multi-criteria weighted aggregated sum product assessment framework for fuel technology selection using q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets , 2020 .

[22]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Wearable technology for personalized construction safety monitoring and trending: Review of applicable devices , 2018 .

[23]  Yan Leng,et al.  Integrated weight-based multi-criteria evaluation on transfer in large transport terminals: A case study of the Beijing South Railway Station , 2014 .

[24]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  A decision support system for software technology selection , 2018, J. Decis. Syst..

[25]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Enhancing Construction Safety Monitoring through the Application of Internet of Things and Wearable Sensing Devices: A Review , 2019, Computing in Civil Engineering 2019.

[26]  M. Haghi,et al.  Wearable Devices in Medical Internet of Things: Scientific Research and Commercially Available Devices , 2017, Healthcare informatics research.

[27]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Improving Decision Support for Software Component Selection through Systematic Cross-Referencing and Analysis of Multiple Decision Criteria , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  Resilient America Roundtable Developing a Decision-Making Framework , 2015 .