Reinforcement Learning in Different Phases of Quantum Control
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pankaj Mehta | Marin Bukov | Alexandre G.R. Day | Dries Sels | Phillip Weinberg | Anatoli Polkovnikov | A. Polkovnikov | M. Bukov | P. Weinberg | Dries Sels | A. G. Day | P. Mehta | Marin Bukov
[1] M. Bukov,et al. QuSpin: a Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems. Part II: bosons, fermions and higher spins , 2018, SciPost Physics.
[2] Pankaj Mehta,et al. Glassy Phase of Optimal Quantum Control. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[3] David J. Schwab,et al. A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists , 2018, Physics reports.
[4] Hartmut Neven,et al. Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning , 2018, npj Quantum Information.
[5] R. Sarpong,et al. Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.
[6] Marin Bukov,et al. Reinforcement Learning to Autonomously Prepare Floquet-Engineered States: Inverting the Quantum Kapitza Oscillator , 2018 .
[7] F. Mintert,et al. Fast adiabatic evolution by oscillating initial Hamiltonians , 2018, Physical Review A.
[8] Enrique Solano,et al. Measurement-based adaptation protocol with quantum reinforcement learning , 2018, Quantum Reports.
[9] Xin Wang,et al. Automatic spin-chain learning to explore the quantum speed limit , 2018, Physical Review A.
[10] Florian Marquardt,et al. Reinforcement Learning with Neural Networks for Quantum Feedback , 2018, Physical Review X.
[11] José Miguel Hernández-Lobato,et al. Taking gradients through experiments: LSTMs and memory proximal policy optimization for black-box quantum control , 2018, ISC Workshops.
[12] Herschel Rabitz,et al. Data-driven gradient algorithm for high-precision quantum control , 2017, 1712.01780.
[13] Marin Bukov,et al. Broken symmetry in a two-qubit quantum control landscape , 2017, 1711.09109.
[14] Mario Krenn,et al. Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] Armin Rahmani,et al. Optimal control of superconducting gmon qubits using Pontryagin's minimum principle: Preparing a maximally entangled state with singular bang-bang protocols , 2017, Physical Review A.
[16] Stefano Carretta,et al. Superadiabatic driving of a three-level quantum system , 2017 .
[17] Armin Rahmani,et al. Optimal control of Gmon qubits using Pontyagin's minimum principle: preparing a maximally entangled state with singular bang-bang protocols , 2017 .
[18] Christopher R. Laumann,et al. Clustering in Hilbert space of a quantum optimization problem , 2017, ArXiv.
[19] Antonio Celani,et al. Flow Navigation by Smart Microswimmers via Reinforcement Learning , 2017, Physical review letters.
[20] D. Schuster,et al. Speedup for quantum optimal control from automatic differentiation based on graphics processing units , 2016, 1612.04929.
[21] Grant M. Rotskoff,et al. Geometric approach to optimal nonequilibrium control: Minimizing dissipation in nanomagnetic spin systems. , 2016, Physical review. E.
[22] A. Polkovnikov,et al. Minimizing irreversible losses in quantum systems by local counterdiabatic driving , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[23] Matthias Troyer,et al. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks , 2016, Science.
[24] L. Hollenberg,et al. Superadiabatic quantum state transfer in spin chains , 2016, 1604.04885.
[25] M. Rigol,et al. Emergent Eigenstate Solution to Quantum Dynamics Far from Equilibrium , 2015, 1512.05373.
[26] M. Bukov,et al. QuSpin: a Python Package for Dynamics and Exact Diagonalisation of Quantum Many Body Systems part I: spin chains , 2016, 1610.03042.
[27] Hans-J. Briegel,et al. Quantum-enhanced machine learning , 2016, Physical review letters.
[28] Gautam Reddy,et al. Learning to soar in turbulent environments , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] Hartmut Neven,et al. Optimizing Variational Quantum Algorithms using Pontryagin's Minimum Principle , 2016, ArXiv.
[30] F. J. Heremans,et al. Accelerated quantum control using superadiabatic dynamics in a solid-state lambda system , 2016, Nature Physics.
[31] L. D'alessio,et al. Adiabatic Perturbation Theory and Geometry of Periodically-Driven Systems , 2016, 1606.02229.
[32] Matteo G. A. Paris,et al. Assessing the significance of fidelity as a figure of merit in quantum state reconstruction of discrete and continuous-variable systems , 2016, 1604.00313.
[33] Roger G. Melko,et al. Machine learning phases of matter , 2016, Nature Physics.
[34] Grant M. Rotskoff,et al. Near-optimal protocols in complex nonequilibrium transformations , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[35] Dries Sels,et al. Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems , 2016, 1602.01062.
[36] Demis Hassabis,et al. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search , 2016, Nature.
[37] A. Baksic,et al. Supplementary information for “ Speeding up adiabatic quantum state transfer by using dressed states ” , 2016 .
[38] H. Neven,et al. Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit , 2015, Nature.
[39] I. Bloch,et al. Optimal control of complex atomic quantum systems , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[40] A. Zeilinger,et al. Automated Search for new Quantum Experiments. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[41] P. Manju,et al. Fast machine-learning online optimization of ultra-cold-atom experiments , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[42] Mads Kock Pedersen,et al. Exploring the quantum speed limit with computer games , 2015, Nature.
[43] D. Schuster,et al. Speedup for quantum optimal control from GPU-based automatic differentiation , 2016 .
[44] Shane Legg,et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning , 2015, Nature.
[45] Barry C Sanders,et al. High-Fidelity Single-Shot Toffoli Gate via Quantum Control. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[46] Rahul Nandkishore,et al. Nonlocal adiabatic response of a localized system to local manipulations , 2014, Nature Physics.
[47] A. Retzker,et al. Realization of a Quantum Integer-Spin Chain with Controllable Interactions , 2014, 1410.0937.
[48] Masoud Mohseni,et al. Quantum brachistochrone curves as geodesics: obtaining accurate minimum-time protocols for the control of quantum systems. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[49] Tzyh Jong Tarn,et al. Fidelity-Based Probabilistic Q-Learning for Control of Quantum Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.
[50] Barry C. Sanders,et al. Evolutionary Algorithms for Hard Quantum Control , 2014, 1403.0943.
[51] D J Egger,et al. Adaptive hybrid optimal quantum control for imprecisely characterized systems. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[52] B. Lanyon,et al. Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many-body system , 2014, Nature.
[53] S Montangero,et al. Information theoretical analysis of quantum optimal control. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[54] C. Jarzynski,et al. Classical and Quantum Shortcuts to Adiabaticity for Scale-Invariant Driving , 2014, 1401.1184.
[55] S. Lloyd,et al. Complexity of controlling quantum many-body dynamics , 2013, 1301.6015.
[56] Matteo G. A. Paris,et al. Drawbacks of the use of fidelity to assess quantum resources , 2013, 1309.5325.
[57] A. Campo,et al. Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdiabatic driving. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[58] G. C. Hegerfeldt,et al. Driving at the quantum speed limit: optimal control of a two-level system. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[59] C. Jarzynski. Generating shortcuts to adiabaticity in quantum and classical dynamics , 2013, 1305.4967.
[60] Marco Genovese,et al. Experimental estimation of quantum discord for a polarization qubit and the use of fidelity to assess quantum correlations , 2013, 1305.4475.
[61] H. Schättler,et al. Geometric Optimal Control , 2012 .
[62] Mazyar Mirrahimi,et al. Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states , 2011, Nature.
[63] C. Monroe,et al. Onset of a quantum phase transition with a trapped ion quantum simulator. , 2011, Nature communications.
[64] M. Greiner,et al. Quantum simulation of antiferromagnetic spin chains in an optical lattice , 2011, Nature.
[65] Tommaso Calarco,et al. Chopped random-basis quantum optimization , 2011, 1103.0855.
[66] S. Glaser,et al. Second order gradient ascent pulse engineering. , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance.
[67] A. Gruslys,et al. Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework , 2010, 1011.4874.
[68] Tommaso Calarco,et al. Optimal control technique for many-body quantum dynamics. , 2010, Physical review letters.
[69] M. Berry,et al. Transitionless quantum driving , 2009 .
[70] J. P. Garrahan,et al. Dynamic Order-Disorder in Atomistic Models of Structural Glass Formers , 2009, Science.
[71] Stuart A Rice,et al. On the consistency, extremal, and global properties of counterdiabatic fields. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.
[72] J. García-Ripoll. Time evolution algorithms for Matrix Product States and DMRG , 2006, cond-mat/0610210.
[73] Christopher M. Bishop,et al. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .
[74] J. García-Ripoll. Time evolution of Matrix Product States , 2006, cond-mat/0602305.
[75] A. Cavagna,et al. Spin-glass theory for pedestrians , 2005, cond-mat/0505032.
[76] Stuart A Rice,et al. Assisted adiabatic passage revisited. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[77] Timo O. Reiss,et al. Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.
[78] L. Vandersypen,et al. NMR techniques for quantum control and computation , 2004, quant-ph/0404064.
[79] Richard S. Sutton,et al. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[80] Stuart A. Rice,et al. Adiabatic Population Transfer with Control Fields , 2003 .
[81] Shlomo E. Sklarz,et al. Loading a Bose-Einstein condensate onto an optical lattice: An application of optimal control theory to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation , 2002, cond-mat/0209195.
[82] M. Mézard,et al. Analytic and Algorithmic Solution of Random Satisfiability Problems , 2002, Science.
[83] R. Brockett,et al. Time optimal control in spin systems , 2000, quant-ph/0006114.
[84] Kompa,et al. Whither the future of controlling quantum phenomena? , 2000, Science.
[85] S. Glaser,et al. Unitary control in quantum ensembles: maximizing signal intensity in coherent spectroscopy , 1998, Science.
[86] H. Rabitz,et al. Teaching lasers to control molecules. , 1992, Physical review letters.
[87] Y. Saad. Analysis of some Krylov subspace approximations to the matrix exponential operator , 1992 .
[88] W. H. Kirk. And and Or , 1921 .