Analysis of Bridge Transition Zones in Railways Considering the Moisture Condition of the Ballast and Subballast

Transition zones in railway tracks are the locations with considerable changes in vertical support structures, e.g., near bridges. Due to possible water flow constrictions in transition zone structures, there is frequently an increased moisture level in the ballast/subballast layers, which is a potential source of track degradation. This paper presents results of the moisture condition measured in three transition zones using ground penetrating radar, where the ballast/subballast are analyzed. The relationship between the moisture condition and track degradation in the transition zones is studied by comparing it to the longitudinal track level that is measured by the track inspection coaches. A strong connection is found between the high moisture condition and track degradation in the transition zones. The dynamic behavior of the transition zones with high moisture condition is analyzed using the Finite Element method. Differential stiffness and settlement are taken into consideration in the transition zone model, which is also coupled with a vehicle. The ballast/subballast layers are modelled as solid elements. Increased moisture conditions are considered as a reduction of elastic modulus, according to laboratory findings. Results show that high moisture leads to an increase of dynamic wheel loads in the transition zone, which explains the connection and confirms that the high moisture condition is a source of transition zone problems

[1]  Antti Nurmikolu,et al.  Identifying frost-susceptible areas on Finnish railways using the ground penetrating radar technique , 2013 .

[2]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  State-of-the-art : track degradation at bridge transitions , 2013 .

[3]  Valeri Markine,et al.  Improvement of train-track interaction in transition zones via reduction of ballast damage , 2015 .

[4]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Transition of Railroad Bridge Approaches , 2005 .

[5]  Andreas Lundqvist,et al.  Railway track stiffness variation - consequences and countermeasures , 2010 .

[6]  Andrew Chan,et al.  Measurements and simulation of the dynamic responses of a bridge–embankment transition zone below a heavy haul railway line , 2013 .

[7]  Tore Dahlberg,et al.  Some railroad settlement models—A critical review , 2001 .

[8]  T Saarenketo,et al.  USING GPR ON RAILWAYS TO IDENTIFY FROST SUSCEPTIBLE AREAS , 2003 .

[9]  Jean-Louis Briaud,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of the Bump at the End of the Railway Bridge , 2011 .

[10]  Ernest T. Selig,et al.  Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management , 1995 .

[11]  H. Scheffel,et al.  The Vertical Dynamic Response of a Rail Vehicle caused by Track Stiffness Variations along the Track , 1996 .

[12]  P. J. Grabe,et al.  The use of ground-penetrating radar to develop a track substructure characterisation model , 2013 .

[13]  Antti Nurmikolu,et al.  An Inspection of Railway Ballast Quality Using Ground Penetrating Radar in Finland , 2010 .

[14]  Johannes Hugenschmidt,et al.  Railway track inspection using GPR , 2000 .

[15]  Simon Iwnicki,et al.  The Manchester Benchmarks for Rail Vehicle Simulation , 1998 .

[16]  William F. Anderson,et al.  Model Testing of Two-Layer Railway Track Ballast , 2000 .

[17]  P. Hölscher,et al.  Settlement of ballasted track under traffic loading: Application to transition zones , 2014 .

[18]  Paul Weston,et al.  The behaviour of railway level crossings: Insights through field monitoring , 2014 .

[19]  Rui Calçada,et al.  Under sleeper pads in transition zones at railway underpasses: numerical modelling and experimental validation , 2015 .

[20]  Sato Yoshihiko,et al.  Japanese Studies on Deterioration of Ballasted Track , 1995 .

[21]  Eldon J Yoder,et al.  Effects of Repeated Loading on Gravel and Crushed Stone Base Course Materials Used in the AASHO Road Test , 1963 .

[22]  William Powrie,et al.  An Assessment of Transition Zone Performance , 2011 .

[23]  B. Coelho.  Dynamics of railway transition zones in soft soils , 2011 .

[24]  Rui Calçada,et al.  Design and construction of backfills for railway track transition zones , 2015 .

[25]  X Lei,et al.  Influence of Track Stiffness Distribution on Vehicle and Track Interactions in Track Transition , 2010 .

[26]  Justin Kennedy,et al.  Behaviour of train–track interaction in stiffness transitions , 2012 .

[27]  P. Woodward,et al.  Track Stiffness Management using the XiTRACK GeoComposite , 2004 .

[28]  Michael Forde,et al.  Electromagnetic properties of railway ballast , 2001 .

[29]  Andreas Lundqvist,et al.  Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers , 2005 .

[30]  B. Indraratna,et al.  Field Assessment of the Performance of a Ballasted Rail Track with and without Geosynthetics , 2010 .

[31]  Raimundo Delgado,et al.  Calibration and experimental validation of a dynamic model of the train-track system at a culvert transition zone , 2018 .

[32]  Rui Calçada,et al.  A numerical study on the influence of backfill settlements in the train/track interaction at transition zones to railway bridges , 2016 .

[33]  Luigi dell’Olio,et al.  Track transitions in railways: A review , 2016 .

[34]  Rolf Dollevoet,et al.  Analysis of the Dynamic Behaviour of a Railway Track in Transition Zones With Differential Settlement , 2015 .

[35]  Timo Saarenketo,et al.  Electrical properties of water in clay and silty soils , 1998 .

[36]  I. Y. Shevtsov,et al.  Improvement of vehicle–turnout interaction by optimising the shape of crossing nose , 2014 .

[37]  Ulf Isacsson,et al.  State of the Art. I: Resilient Response of Unbound Aggregates , 2000 .

[38]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  A nonlinear damage accumulation model for shakedown failure , 2007 .

[39]  J. N. Varandas,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of railway tracks on transitions zones , 2011 .

[40]  Carlton L. Ho,et al.  Evaluating Fouled Ballast Using Seismic Surface Waves , 2016 .

[41]  Daniela Ionescu,et al.  Compression and Degradation of Railway Ballast Under One-Dimensional Loading , 1997 .

[42]  James P Hyslip,et al.  Railway Bridge Transition Case Study , 2009 .

[43]  Jianhui Lin,et al.  Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations , 2004 .

[44]  Hem Hunt,et al.  Settlement of railway track near bridge abutments , 1997 .

[45]  Stephen T. Wilk,et al.  Root cause of differential movement at bridge transition zones , 2016 .

[46]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Railway Bridge Approaches under Heavy Axle Load Traffic: Problems, Causes, and Remedies , 2010 .