An optimization-based model for maximizing the benefits of fast-track construction activities

Fast-track construction projects have become more popular in recent years in response to growing industry demand. By allowing downstream construction activities to start with incomplete information from upstream design activities, fast-tracking (through overlapping) allows for shorter project duration at the expense of potential rework. This leaves practitioners with the challenge of determining the optimal fast-tracking strategy to meet project schedule requirements while avoiding excessive amounts of rework. This paper presents an optimization-based model that serves as a decision support tool in scheduling fast-track construction activities. The model takes into consideration information exchange between upstream and downstream activities and uses the concepts of sensitivity and evolution to maximize the net benefits of fast-tracking. The model is illustrated on an ongoing construction project, which was analysed under various overlapping scenarios. The results indicate substantial time savings depending on the speed of evolution and sensitivity. The project schedule can be shortened by up to 50 days without causing excessive amounts of rework.

[1]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Rework on Construction Cost Performance , 2009 .

[2]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Simulation of Overlapping Design Activities in Concurrent Engineering , 2011 .

[3]  J. Y. Ruwanpura,et al.  The Mechanism of Design Activity Overlapping in Construction Projects and the Time-Cost Tradeoff Function , 2011 .

[4]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Sensitivity of Construction Activities under Design Uncertainty , 2009 .

[5]  David N. Ford,et al.  System Dynamics Applied to Project Management: A Survey, Assessment, and Directions for Future Research , 2007, System Dynamics.

[6]  Hisham M. E. Abdelsalam,et al.  A simulation-based optimization framework for product development cycle time reduction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[7]  S H Wearne.  Fast-track project direction , 1984 .

[8]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Investigating product development process reliability and robustness using simulation , 2007 .

[9]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Strategies for overlapping dependent design activities , 2006 .

[10]  David K. H. Chua,et al.  A simulation model to study the impact of early information on design duration and redesign , 2011 .

[11]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[12]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Divergence or Congruence? A Path Model of Rework for Building and Civil Engineering Projects , 2009 .

[13]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Rework in Civil Infrastructure Projects: Determination of Cost Predictors , 2010 .

[14]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Prediction System for Change Management in Construction Project , 2010 .

[15]  Issam Srour,et al.  A methodology for scheduling overlapped design activities based on dependency information , 2013 .

[16]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[17]  Moonseo Park,et al.  Reliability and Stability Buffering Approach: Focusing on the Issues of Errors and Changes in Concurrent Design and Construction Projects , 2006 .

[18]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems , 2002 .

[19]  Zhuo Liu,et al.  Optimizing Concurrent Execution of Design Activities with Minimum Redesign , 2012 .

[20]  Colin S. Gray,et al.  US productivity and fast tracking starts on the drawing board , 1984 .

[21]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering , 1998 .

[22]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Benchmark tests for BIM data exchanges of precast concrete , 2009 .

[23]  Andrew N. Baldwin,et al.  Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): a dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design process , 2000 .

[24]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  DYNAMIC PLANNING AND CONTROL METHODOLOGY FOR DESIGN/BUILD FAST-TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS , 2001 .

[25]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Vicious circles of parallelism , 1995 .

[26]  David N. Ford,et al.  Managing Tipping Point Dynamics in Complex Construction Projects , 2008 .

[27]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction , 2000 .

[28]  Yoke San Wong,et al.  Optimal overlapping and functional interaction in product development , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  Aligning building information model tools and construction management methods , 2012 .

[30]  Yoke San Wong,et al.  A dynamic model for managing overlapped iterative product development , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  David N. Ford,et al.  Overcoming the 90% Syndrome: Iteration Management in Concurrent Development Projects , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[32]  David J. Edwards,et al.  A rework reduction model for construction projects , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.