Assessment of corporate sustainability: study of hybrid relations using Hybrid Bottom Line model

Corporate sustainability reporting is currently perceived by company directors and senior staff as a process with a great strategic relevance. However, although sustainability is recognized as an integrating phenomenon and part of corporate life, it is in practice often treated in a one-dimensional manner. There is also a paucity of research specifically aimed at assessing sustainability report in the broad sense. The objectives of this article are therefore to analyse and evaluate reported information (indicators) based on the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines and to select and examine the most promising two-dimensional hybrid relations to enable the evaluation of company performance and its position towards practiced sustainability. The 2011 sustainability reports of 85 companies of different sizes and economic sectors from 36 countries were analysed. On the one hand, it became clear that companies focus their attention on ‘anchor’ indicators and, consequently, there is a low level of representativity in the number of integrations. Performance evaluation, on the other hand, has proved to be a useful process with the potential to trigger the implementation of prospective change. It is, therefore, important that decision-makers may consider including hybrid indicators in the preparation of regulations and guidelines.

[1]  R. Lozano.  Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally , 2008 .

[2]  I. Gallego.  The use of economic, social and environmental indicators as a measure of sustainable development in Spain , 2006 .

[3]  K. Bonnedahl,et al.  Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: a review and conceptual comparison of market- and stakeholder-oriented strategies , 2013 .

[4]  Pierre Macherey,et al.  IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT , 2015 .

[5]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[6]  L. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies , 2008 .

[7]  V. Valentinov.  Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: insights from Boulding and Luhmann , 2013 .

[8]  R. Didham,et al.  Social Learning for Sustainability , 2015 .

[9]  D. Wood.  Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review , 2010 .

[10]  Anna Young.  Sustainability Accounting and Reporting: Fad or Trend? , 2011 .

[11]  M. Joshi,et al.  Reporting Intellectual Capital in Annual Reports from Australian S/W & I/T Companies , 2010 .

[12]  R. Burritt,et al.  Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend? , 2010 .

[13]  A. Carroll,et al.  The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice , 2010 .

[14]  C. Cashman.  [European agency for safety and health at work]. , 2013, Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales.

[15]  S. Schaltegger,et al.  The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy , 2002 .

[16]  T. Soobaroyen,et al.  Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004–2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories , 2011 .

[17]  J. Elkington.  Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[18]  J. M. Moneva,et al.  GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability , 2006 .

[19]  Julia Blasch,et al.  Sustainability standards for bioenergy—A means to reduce climate change risks? , 2010 .

[20]  G. Sapelli.  On “Corporate Responsibility” , 2013 .

[21]  Shih-Fang Lo,et al.  Performance evaluation for sustainable business: a profitability and marketability framework , 2010 .

[22]  A. Martinuzzi,et al.  Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations , 2005 .

[23]  Antonio Tencati,et al.  Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems , 2006 .

[24]  Kelly Freeman,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Sustainability Reporting : An Alternative Methodological Approach , 2004 .

[25]  J. Moon,et al.  'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[26]  Walter Leal Filho,et al.  Dealing with misconceptions on the concept of sustainability , 2000 .

[27]  Julia Blasch,et al.  Sustainability standards for bioenergy – a means to reduce climate change risks , 2009 .

[28]  Vinay Kumar,et al.  Sustainability as corporate culture of a brand for superior performance , 2013 .

[29]  Frank Figge,et al.  The Cost of Sustainability Capital and the Creation of Sustainable Value by Companies , 2005 .

[30]  Mark Smith,et al.  Can less sometimes be more? Integrating land use and transport planning on Merseyside (1965–2008) , 2013 .

[31]  M. Linnenluecke,et al.  Corporate sustainability and organizational culture , 2010 .

[32]  F. Székely,et al.  Responsible Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility:: Metrics for Sustainable Performance , 2005 .

[33]  Leal Filho.  Dealing with misconceptions on the concept of , 2000 .

[34]  W. Filho,et al.  Hybrid Bottom Line: another perspective on the sustainability of organizations , 2014 .

[35]  D. Rogers,et al.  A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory , 2008 .

[36]  Mahesh Joshi,et al.  The reporting of intellectual capital in annual reports: Evidence from the Australian software and information technology companies , 2010 .

[37]  R. Craig,et al.  Factors associated with the publication of a CEO letter , 2013 .

[38]  D. Blacker.  Food for thought. , 2013, JAMA neurology.

[39]  J. Elkington.  Enter the Triple Bottom Line , 2013 .

[40]  David L. Levy,et al.  The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance , 2010 .

[41]  Ivan Montiel,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability , 2008 .

[42]  F. Green,et al.  Fears and Realisations of Employment Insecurity , 2012 .

[43]  Carol A. Adams,et al.  Making a difference : sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. , 2007 .

[44]  黃志豪,et al.  Responsible Leadership , 2020, Prepare and Protect.

[45]  Kamalesh Kumar,et al.  Examining the Link between Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: An Analysis of the Best Corporate Citizens , 2013 .

[46]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  The greening of Wal-Mart's supply chain , 2007 .

[47]  Frank Wiengarten,et al.  ISO 14000 certification and investments in environmental supply chain management practices: identifying differences in motivation and adoption levels between Western European and North American companies , 2013 .

[48]  R. Baumgartner,et al.  Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels , 2010 .

[49]  Jeltje van der Meer-Kooistra,et al.  Reporting on intellectual capital , 2001 .

[50]  Vivien Beattie,et al.  Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosures , 2007 .

[51]  D. Huisingh,et al.  Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting , 2011 .

[52]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  FOOD FOR THOUGHT: SOCIAL VERSUS ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES , 2009 .

[53]  Leda E. Nath,et al.  The Supply of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures Among U.S. Firms , 2009 .

[54]  Janette Brunstein,et al.  Social learning for sustainability: supporting sustainable business in Brazil regarding multiple social actors, relationships and interests , 2014 .

[55]  C. Searcy,et al.  An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports , 2012 .

[56]  Alan Wade,et al.  Mind the sustainability gap. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[57]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[58]  Thomas Fischer,et al.  Should different impact assessment instruments be integrated? Evidence from , 2013 .