Testing the drift-diffusion model

Significance The drift-diffusion model (DDM) has been widely used in psychology and neuroeconomics to explain observed patterns of choices and response times. This paper provides an identification and characterization theorems for this model: We show that the parameters are uniquely pinned down and determine which datasets are consistent with some form of DDM. We then develop a statistical test of the model based on finite datasets using spline estimation. These results establish the empirical content of the model and provide a way for researchers to see when it is applicable. The drift-diffusion model (DDM) is a model of sequential sampling with diffusion signals, where the decision maker accumulates evidence until the process hits either an upper or lower stopping boundary and then stops and chooses the alternative that corresponds to that boundary. In perceptual tasks, the drift of the process is related to which choice is objectively correct, whereas in consumption tasks, the drift is related to the relative appeal of the alternatives. The simplest version of the DDM assumes that the stopping boundaries are constant over time. More recently, a number of papers have used nonconstant boundaries to better fit the data. This paper provides a statistical test for DDMs with general, nonconstant boundaries. As a by-product, we show that the drift and the boundary are uniquely identified. We use our condition to nonparametrically estimate the drift and the boundary and construct a test statistic based on finite samples.

[1]  Weijie Zhong,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Information Acquisition , 2017, Econometrica.

[2]  W. Newey,et al.  The influence function of semiparametric estimators , 2015, Quantitative Economics.

[3]  Annie Liang,et al.  Dynamically Aggregating Diverse Information , 2019, EC.

[4]  E. Fehr,et al.  Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy , 2018, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  A Behavioral Characterization of the Drift Diffusion Model and Its Multialternative Extension for Choice Under Time Pressure , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Michael Woodford,et al.  Rational Inattention When Decisions Take Time , 2019, J. Econ. Theory.

[7]  Annie Liang,et al.  Complementary Information and Learning Traps , 2019, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

[8]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Optimal policy for multi-alternative decisions , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  K. Chiong,et al.  Combining Choice and Response Time Data: A Drift-Diffusion Model of Mobile Advertisements , 2019, Management Science.

[10]  Paulo Natenzon,et al.  Random Choice and Learning , 2019, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Allocation of Attention , 2018, American Economic Review.

[12]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Speed, Accuracy, and the Optimal Timing of Choices , 2018, American Economic Review.

[13]  J. Clithero Improving Out-of-Sample Predictions Using Response Times and a Model of the Decision Process , 2018 .

[14]  K. Chiong,et al.  Split-second Decision-Making in the Field : Response Times in Mobile Advertising ∗ , 2018 .

[15]  Michael Woodford,et al.  Rational Inattention and Sequential Information Sampling , 2017 .

[16]  Kota Saito,et al.  Response Time and Utility , 2017 .

[17]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  Optimal Sequential Decision with Limited Attention∗ , 2016 .

[18]  Michael Woodford,et al.  Rational Inattention with Sequential Information Sampling∗ , 2016 .

[19]  W. Newey,et al.  Constrained Conditional Moment Restriction Models , 2015, Econometrica.

[20]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference , 2015, Nature Communications.

[21]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Revisiting the Evidence for Collapsing Boundaries and Urgency Signals in Perceptual Decision-Making , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Thomas A. Weber,et al.  Dynamic Information Acquisition , 2015 .

[23]  Michael Woodford,et al.  An Optimizing Neuroeconomic Model of Discrete Choice , 2014 .

[24]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Decision Making as a Window on Cognition , 2013, Neuron.

[25]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  Combining Response Times and Choice Data Using A Neuroeconomic Model of the Decision Process Improves Out-of-Sample Predictions ∗ , 2013 .

[26]  Kengo Kato,et al.  Some new asymptotic theory for least squares series: Pointwise and uniform results , 2012, 1212.0442.

[27]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Attentional Drift-Diffusion Model Extends to Simple Purchasing Decisions , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[28]  A. Pouget,et al.  The Cost of Accumulating Evidence in Perceptual Decision Making , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  E. Fehr,et al.  Neuroeconomic Foundations of Economic Choice—Recent Advances , 2011 .

[30]  A. Rangel,et al.  Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Nagel,et al.  Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study , 2011 .

[32]  D. Cutler,et al.  The (paper) work of medicine: understanding international medical costs. , 2011, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.

[33]  J. Stein,et al.  A Macroprudential Approach to Financial Regulation , 2010 .

[34]  Christof Koch,et al.  The drift diffusion model can account for value-based choice response times under high and low time pressure , 2010 .

[35]  Ian Krajbich,et al.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Christof Koch,et al.  The Drift Diffusion Model Can Account for the Accuracy and Reaction Time of Value-Based Choices Under High and Low Time Pressure , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[37]  Laura Sacerdote,et al.  On the inverse first-passage-time problem for a Wiener process , 2009, 0908.4213.

[38]  Whitney K. Newey,et al.  Generalized method of moments with many weak moment conditions , 2009 .

[39]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[40]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Computational Models of Decision Making , 2003 .

[41]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[42]  R. Ratcliff A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  J. Townsend,et al.  Multialternative Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic Connectionist Model of Decision Making , 2001 .

[44]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[45]  Yongmiao Hong,et al.  Consistent Specification Testing via Nonparametric Series Regression , 1995 .

[46]  W. Newey,et al.  The asymptotic variance of semiparametric estimators , 1994 .

[47]  H. Bierens,et al.  On the Limit Behavior of a Chi-Square Type Test if the Number of Conditional Moments Tested Approaches Infinity , 1994, Econometric Theory.

[48]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[49]  J. Townsend,et al.  Fundamental derivations from decision field theory , 1992 .

[50]  A. G. Nobile,et al.  On the two-boundary first-crossing-time problem for diffusion processes , 1990, Journal of Applied Probability.

[51]  D. Pollard,et al.  Simulation and the Asymptotics of Optimization Estimators , 1989 .

[52]  D. McFadden A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models Without Numerical Integration , 1989 .

[53]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[54]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[55]  J. Aczél,et al.  Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications , 1968 .

[56]  W. Edwards Optimal strategies for seeking information: Models for statistics, choice reaction times, and human information processing ☆ , 1965 .

[57]  M. Stone Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .