Weight Prediction of the Lifting System for an Unconventional Aircraft Configuration

In this paper a tool, previously developed and validated for the prediction of wing box structural weight in very early design stages, is improved to better match effects on panel sizing of stability constraints. It is applied to an unconventional configuration aircraft based on the Best Wing System concept, introduced by Ludwig Prandtl in 1924, to achieve minimum induced drag: such lifting system is composed of two swept wings (fore and aft) connected by vertical wings at their tips and two fins connecting the rear wing to the fuselage. The system is over-constrained to the fuselage and, thus, the structural design, as well as the static aeroelasticity and flutter characteristics, totally differs from a conventional aircraft. An optimization method finds out a suitable prediction of the structural weight by defining the wing span stiffness behavior compatible with a mix of global and local design constraints, but without any claim about a structural design. The link among stiffness properties and structural weight is made by means of simplified models of the box cross-sections, suitable also to supply responses for the approximated evaluation of local constraints.

[1]  Prabhat Hajela,et al.  Preliminary weight estimation of conventional and joined wings usingequivalent beam models , 1988 .

[2]  Franco Mastroddi,et al.  On the use of geometry design variables in the MDO analysis of wing structures with aeroelastic constraints on stability and response , 2011 .

[3]  Frank W. Spaid,et al.  Aerodynamic Design of High-Perf ormance Biplane Wings , 1975 .

[4]  Gerald Kress,et al.  Mass estimation of transport aircraft wingbox structures with a CAD/CAE-based multidisciplinary process , 2011 .

[5]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Advanced configurations for very large transport airplanes , 1998 .

[6]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Aerodynamic and structural studies of joined-wing aircraft , 1991 .

[7]  Thomas Klimmek,et al.  Multidisciplinary Wing Optimization Using a Wing Box Layout Concept and a Parametric Thickness Model , 2002 .

[8]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  A General Approach to Multiple Lifting Surface Design and Analysis , 1984 .

[9]  R. K. Nangia,et al.  Unconventional High Aspect Ratio Joined-Wing Aircraft with Aft- and Forward-Swept Wing-Tips , 2003 .

[10]  E. Torenbeek,et al.  Development and application of a comprehensive, design-sensitive weight prediction method for wing structures of transport category aircraft , 1992 .

[11]  Wilfried Becker,et al.  Implementation of a multi-level optimisation methodology within the e-design of a blended wing body☆ , 2004 .

[12]  J. Wolkovitch,et al.  The joined wing - An overview , 1985 .

[13]  Aldo Frediani,et al.  The PrandtlPlane aircraft configuration , 2006 .

[14]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  Multilevel Structural Optimization for Preliminary Wing-Box Weight Estimation , 2010 .

[15]  Tracy Lane Bagwill Aerodynamic investigation of joined wing configurations for transport aircraft , 1996 .

[16]  E. Torenbeek,et al.  Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design , 1979 .

[17]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  Comparison of Beam and Shell Theory for Mass Estimation in Preliminary Wing Design , 2010 .

[18]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Structural optimization by multilevel decomposition , 1983 .

[19]  Craig S. Collier,et al.  3509. Airframe Wingbox Preliminary Design and Weight Prediction , 2010 .

[20]  Gerald Kress,et al.  Investigation of local load introduction methods in aircraft pre-design , 2012 .

[21]  T Haftka Raphael,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments , 1996 .