Interference and facilitation effects of primes upon verification processes

Priming effects on sentence verification were investigated. The semantic relation of the prime and the probe, and the interval between prime and probe presentation (SOA), were varied for both ambiguous and unambiguous sentences. Reaction time to decide that a sentence was true or false was longer if the preceding prime was a word that was unrelated to the probe than if the prime was the word “blank.” In contradiction of Posner and Snyder’s (1975) claim that conscious processes develop slowly, this result was found at SOAs as short as 250 msec. Verification performance was facilitated for both sentence types when the prime word was the first of the to-be-presented probe sentence, but the magnitude of the facilitation effects depended upon the truth value of the probe, the associative strength of the subject and predicate of the probe sentence, and upon SOA. These findings indicate that priming affects the processing of relations among concepts in semantic memory, as well as the encoding of the probe.

[1]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[2]  J. L. Myers.  Fundamentals of Experimental Design , 1972 .

[3]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[4]  Eugene Winograd,et al.  Norms of semantic encoding variability for fifty homographs , 1974 .

[5]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[6]  Phebe Cramer,et al.  A STUDY OF HOMOGRAPHS , 1970 .

[7]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[8]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  M. Ashcraft.  Priming and property dominance effects in semantic memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[10]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[11]  Allan Collins,et al.  Facilitating retrieval from semantic memory: The effect of repeating part of an inference , 1970 .

[12]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Homa,et al.  Triadic decision making in lexical memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Stephen J. Antos.  Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task. , 1979 .

[15]  G. Shulman,et al.  On the Construction and Maintenance of Expectancies , 1978 .

[16]  J. Yates,et al.  Priming dominant and unusual senses of ambiguous words , 1978 .

[17]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  A. Wilkins.  Conjoint frequency, category size, and categorization time , 1971 .

[19]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[20]  W. C. Ruediger.  Memory and thought. , 1919 .

[21]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[22]  Donald H. Kausler,et al.  Word associations to homographs , 1970 .

[23]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[24]  John R. Anderson.  Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[25]  E M Comstock,et al.  Processing capacity in a letter-matching task. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  E. Loftus,et al.  The influence of one memory retrieval on a subsequent memory retrieval , 1974, Memory & cognition.