The influence of time headway on subjective driver states in adaptive cruise control

Abstract There is no agreement on the relation between driving parameters and drivers’ subjective states. A linear as well as a threshold relationship for different subjective variables and driving parameters has been put forward. In this study we investigate the relationship between time headway and the ratings of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort. Knowledge about this interrelation may advance the development of adaptive cruise control and autonomous driving and can add to the discussion about driver behavior models. An earlier study (Lewis-Evans, De Waard, & Brookhuis, 2010) found a threshold effect for drivers’ ratings of subjective variables for time headways between 0.5 and 4.0 s at a speed of 50 km/h. This study aims to replicate the threshold effect and to expand the findings to time headways at different speeds. A new measure for criticality was added as a categorical variable, indicating the controllability of a driving situation to give indications for the appliance of time headway in adaptive cruise control systems. Participants drove 24 short routes in a driving simulator with predefined speed and time headway to a leading vehicle. Time headway was varied eightfold (0.5–4 s in 0.5 s increments) and speed was varied threefold (50, 100, 150 km/h). A threshold effect for the ratings of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort was found for all three different speeds. Criticality proved to be a useful variable in assessing the preferred time headway of drivers.

[1]  R. Fuller.  Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Elsevier Sdol.  Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour , 2009 .

[3]  Talib Rothengatter,et al.  Task difficulty, risk, effort and comfort in a simulated driving task--Implications for Risk Allostasis Theory. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Traffic psychology theories: Towards understanding driving behaviour and safety efforts , 2005 .

[5]  Charles Desjardins,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: A Reinforcement Learning Approach , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  A. Schadschneider,et al.  Single-vehicle data of highway traffic: a statistical analysis. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[7]  A Touran,et al.  A collision model for safety evaluation of autonomous intelligent cruise control. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  R. Fuller,et al.  Iconography : Task difficulty and risk in the determination of driver behaviour , 2007 .

[9]  Eva-Maria Eick,et al.  Adaptation Effects in an Automated Car-Following Scenario , 2005 .

[10]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Human behavior and traffic safety , 2011 .

[11]  J. A. Rothengatter,et al.  Traffic &Transport Psychology. , 2004 .

[12]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  A model for the role of motivational factors in drivers' decision-making , 1974 .

[13]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  A Comparision of Spacing and Headway Control Laws for Automatically Controlled Vehicles1 , 1994 .

[14]  John A. Michon,et al.  A critical view of driver behavior models: What do we know , 1985 .

[15]  Heikki Summala,et al.  RISK CONTROL IS NOT RISK ADJUSTMENT: THE ZERO-RISK THEORY OF DRIVER BEHAVIOUR AND ITS IMPLICATIONS , 1988 .

[16]  T A Ranney,et al.  Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Truls Vaa,et al.  Modelling Driver Behaviour on Basis of Emotions and Feelings: Intelligent Transport Systems and Behavioural Adaptations , 2007 .

[18]  Gerald J.S. Wilde,et al.  The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health , 1982 .

[19]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Traffic Psychology Theories , 2005 .

[20]  W. V. Winsum.  THE HUMAN ELEMENT IN CAR FOLLOWING MODELS , 1999 .

[21]  Li Li,et al.  Preferred time-headway of highway drivers , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[22]  Karel A Brookhuis,et al.  That's close enough--a threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.