Identifying causes of disagreement between self-reports and spouse ratings of personality.

Self-reports and spouse ratings of personality traits typically show less-than-perfect agreement, but powerful moderators of agreement have not yet been identified. In Study 1, 47 married couples completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory to describe themselves and their spouses. Extent of agreement was not consistently moderated by response sets; the age, intelligence, or education of the respondent; or the length or quality of the relationship. In Study 2 these couples were interviewed about reasons for substantial disagreements, and an audiotape was content-analyzed. Sixteen reasons were reliably coded, including idiosyncratic understanding of items, reference to different time frames or roles, and unavailability of covert experience to the spouse. Faking good, assumed similarity, and other variables prominent in the psychometric literature were relatively unimportant. Findings (1) suggest that attempts to improve the validity of self-reports and ratings may need to be refocused and (2) underscore the desirability of routinely obtaining multiple sources of information on personality.

[1]  G. Tunnell Intraindividual consistency in personality assessment: The effect of self‐monitoring , 1980 .

[2]  C. Dicken Good Impression, Social Desirability, and Acquiescence as Suppressor Variables , 1963 .

[3]  C. Landis,et al.  The validity of certain questions which purport to measure neurotic tendencies. , 1934 .

[4]  W. Chaplin,et al.  Self-ratings of personality: a naturalistic comparison of normative, ipsative, and idiothetic standards. , 1988, Journal of personality.

[5]  D. Funder,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of personality judgements by the self and knowledgeable others. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[6]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  rp and other coefficients of pattern similarity , 1949, Psychometrika.

[7]  R. McCrae Agreement of Personality Profiles Across Observers. , 1993, Multivariate behavioral research.

[8]  G. Spanier Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads , 1976 .

[9]  Judith M. Tanur,et al.  Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys. , 1993 .

[10]  Robert R. McCrae,et al.  Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings. , 1982 .

[11]  M C Blackman,et al.  Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  P. Costa,et al.  Stability and change in personality assessment: the revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[13]  D L Paulhus,et al.  Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: bilingual, acculturation, and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  D. Funder On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.

[15]  David Arenberg,et al.  Normal Human Aging: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging , 1984 .

[16]  A. Panter,et al.  Shared Meaning and the Convergence among Observers' Personality Descriptions , 1993 .

[17]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Enhancing target variance in personality impressions: highlighting the person in person perception. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  D. Dean,et al.  Definitions of Life Situation and Marital Adjustment , 1984 .

[19]  S. Fiske Social cognition and social perception. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  Neal J. Roese,et al.  Twenty years of bogus pipeline research : a critical review and meta-analysis , 1993 .

[21]  R. McCrae The Counterpoint of Personality Assessment: Self Reports and Observer Ratings , 1994, Assessment.

[22]  P. Costa,et al.  A caution on the use of the MMPI K‐correction in research on psychosomatic medicine. , 1989, Psychosomatic medicine.

[23]  D. Jackson,et al.  Acquiescence and Desirability As Response Determinants On the MMPI , 1961 .

[24]  G. D. Coates,et al.  Development and effects of an MMPI--A K-correction procedure. , 1996, Journal of personality assessment.

[25]  A. Benton The interpretation of questionnaire items iin a personality schedule , 1935 .

[26]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. , 1996 .

[27]  D. Jackson,et al.  ACQUIESCENCE AND DESIRABILITY AS RESPONSE DETERMINANTS ON THE MMPI1 , 1960 .

[28]  I. Rossman,et al.  Normal Human Aging: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging , 1986 .

[29]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Social desirability scales: More substance than style. , 1983 .

[30]  W. Chaplin,et al.  The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[31]  D. Dunning,et al.  Idiosyncratic trait definitions: implications for self-description and social judgment. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  David Dunning,et al.  Egocentric Definitions of Traits and Abilities in Social Judgment , 1992 .

[33]  J. Simpson WECHSLER'S MEASUREMENT AND APPRAISAL OF ADULT INTELLIGENCE , 1974 .

[34]  E. Muten Self-reports, spouse ratings, and psychophysiological assessment in a behavioral medicine program: an application of the five-factor model. , 1991, Journal of personality assessment.

[35]  William Ickes,et al.  Naturalistic Social Cognition: Empathic Accuracy in Mixed-Sex Dyads , 1990 .

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis , 1988 .

[37]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[38]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[39]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[40]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[41]  J. Morse Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction , 1996 .

[42]  B. Kinder,et al.  Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: development and initial validation. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[43]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  W. Stiles Quality control in qualitative research , 1993 .

[45]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. , 1966 .

[46]  M. Schmit,et al.  Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. , 1995 .

[47]  P. Costa,et al.  Trait psychology comes of age. , 1991, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[48]  D. Funder,et al.  Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.