Estimating the Optimal Number of Alternatives to Be Explored in Large Design Spaces: A Step Towards Incorporating Decision Making Cost in Design Decision Models

Exploration of design spaces is an important step in decision-based design. In consumer product development, precise design specifications are not known at the beginning of the design process. It is usually design team’s responsibility to find out the specifications as a part of the design process. This results in large design spaces in consumer product development. Furthermore, market window is usually limited. Thus, it is impractical to examine all possible design alternatives. As part of the design process, design teams need to determine how many alternatives to examine and how much evaluation time should be devoted to examining each alternative. This paper presents a model for estimating the optimal number of alternatives to be explored and the optimal evaluation time for each alternative by incorporating cost of decision-making in the overall design decision model. We also describe a design case study and investigate how characteristics of design task parameters influence the optimal number of alternatives and the optimal evaluation time. Our results indicate that it is difficult to intuitively identify the optimal values of the number of alternatives and the evaluation time for even very simple design tasks. We describe the practical issues that need to be addressed to make these decisions and discuss how the model proposed in this paper can be extended to handle more general cases of design tasks.Copyright © 2002 by ASME

[1]  Michael O. Ball,et al.  Integer programming models for product design , 1999 .

[2]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  AN IMPLEMENTATION OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY IN DECISION BASED DESIGN , 1998 .

[3]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[4]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Integrating Market Research With the Product Development Process: A Step Towards Design for Profit , 2001 .

[5]  H. Li,et al.  Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[6]  G. Hazelrigg Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design , 1996 .

[7]  Daniel Baier,et al.  Optimal product positioning based on paired comparison data , 1998 .

[8]  Giorgio Rizzoni,et al.  An Architecture for Exploring Large Design Spaces , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[9]  George C. Hadjinicola,et al.  Product Positioning and Pricing Under Production Cost Considerations , 1999 .

[10]  V. Rao,et al.  Research for product positioning and design decisions: An integrative review , 1995 .

[11]  G. Dobson,et al.  Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product-line using conjoint and cost data , 1993 .

[12]  R. Kohli,et al.  Heuristics for Product-Line Design Using Conjoint Analysis , 1990 .

[13]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[14]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[15]  Paul E. Green,et al.  A General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint Analysis , 1981 .

[16]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[17]  Fred S. Zufryden,et al.  An Integer Programming Approach to the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem , 1988 .

[18]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.