Modeling and calculation of turbulent lifted diffusion flames

Abstract Liftoff heights of turbulent diffusion flames have been modeled using the laminar diffusion flamelet concept of Peters and Williams [ AIAA J. , 21:423–429 (1983)]. The strain rate of the smallest eddies is used as the stretch describing parameter, instead of the more common scalar dissipation rate. The h ( U ) curve, which is the mean liftoff height as a function of fuel exit velocity can be accurately predicted, while this was impossible with the scalar dissipation rate. Liftoff calculations performed in the flames as well as in the equivalent isothermal jets, using a standard k-ϵ turbulence model yield approximately the same correct slope for the h ( U ) curve while the offset has to be reproduced by chosing an appropriate coefficient in the strain rate model. For the flame calculations a model for the pdf of the fluctuating flame base is proposed. The results are insensitive to its width. The temperature field is qualitatively different from the field calculated by Bradley et al. ( Twenty-Third Symposium on Combustion , 1990, pp. 685–692) who used a premixed flamelet model for diffusion flames.

[1]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  The computation of stretched laminar methane-air diffusion flames using a reduced four-step mechanism , 1987 .

[2]  David E. Keyes,et al.  A Comparison Between Numerical Calculations and Experimental Measurements of the Structure of a Counterflow Methane-Air Diffusion Flame , 1987 .

[3]  J.-Y. Chen Second-order conditional modeling of turbulent nonpremixed flames with a compositep PDF , 1987 .

[4]  L. Vanquickenborne,et al.  The stabilization mechanism of lifted diffusion flames , 1966 .

[5]  F. Williams,et al.  Turbulent Reacting Flows , 1981 .

[6]  J. Sanders,et al.  Scalar transport in a turbulent jet , 1992 .

[7]  T. Gautam,et al.  Lift-Off Heights and Visible Lengths of Vertical Turbulent Jet Diffusion Flames in Still Air , 1984 .

[8]  N. Peters,et al.  Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms for Applications in Combustion Systems , 1993 .

[9]  Wolfgang Kollmann,et al.  Prediction Methods for Turbulent Flows , 1980 .

[10]  F. Spellman Combustion Theory , 2020 .

[11]  W. Jones,et al.  Calculation methods for reacting turbulent flows: A review , 1982 .

[12]  W. Pitts Importance of isothermal mixing processes to the understanding of lift-off and blowout of turbulent jet diffusion flames , 1989 .

[13]  S. K. Liew,et al.  A stretched laminar flamelet model of turbulent nonpremixed combustion , 1984 .

[14]  Franz Durst,et al.  Turbulent Shear Flows I , 1979 .

[15]  D. B. Spalding,et al.  Turbulent shear flows , 1980 .

[16]  Mitchell D. Smooke,et al.  Solution of burner-stabilized premixed laminar flames by boundary value methods , 1982 .

[17]  N. Peters Local Quenching Due to Flame Stretch and Non-Premixed Turbulent Combustion , 1983 .

[18]  Y. Chao,et al.  The stabilization mechanism of the lifted jet diffusion flame in the hysteresis region , 1993 .