论文信息 - Relationships between Stimulus Variation and the Formation of Misconceptions

Relationships between Stimulus Variation and the Formation of Misconceptions

AbstractTwo studies were conducted to determine the relationship between systematic stimulus variation and the formation of misconceptions. Experiment 1 compared five levels of stimulus variation between positive and negative examples, and Experiment 2 compared two levels of stimulus variation among positive examples. Misconceptions were fewer with minimal variation between positive and negative examples and maximal relevant variation among positive examples.

Douglas Carnine | D. Carnine

[1] L. S. Braley. Strategy selection and negative instances in concept learning. , 1963 .

[2] D. Carnine. Two Letter Discrimination Sequences: High-Confusion-Alternatives First versus Low-Confusion-Alternatives First1 , 1980 .

[4] Robert D. Tennyson,et al. Effects of negative instances in concept acquisition using a verbal learning task. , 1973 .

[5] C I HOVLAND,et al. The role of memory in the acquisition of concepts. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6] A. Buss. A study of concept formation as a function of reinforcement and stimulus generalization. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7] Direct Instruction: a Successful System for Educationally High‐Risk Children , 1979 .

[8] D. Carnine,et al. Child Performance on Discrimination Tasks: Effects of Amount of Stimulus Variation. , 1977 .

[9] E. Archer,et al. Concept identification as a function of task complexity and distribution of practice. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10] E. Archer,et al. Concept identification as a function of obviousness of relevant and irrelevant information. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11] Concept identification as a function of probability of positive instances and number of relevant dimensions. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.