Incorporating spatial interaction patterns in classifying and understanding urban land use

ABSTRACT Land use classification has benefited from the emerging big data, such as mobile phone records and taxi trajectories. Temporal activity variations derived from these data have been used to interpret and understand the land use of parcels from the perspective of social functions, complementing the outcome of traditional remote sensing methods. However, spatial interaction patterns between parcels, which could depict land uses from a perspective of connections, have rarely been examined and analysed. To leverage spatial interaction information contained in the above-mentioned massive data sets, we propose a novel unsupervised land use classification method with a new type of place signature. Based on the observation that spatial interaction patterns between places of two specific land uses are similar, the new place signature improves land use classification by trading off between aggregated temporal activity variations and detailed spatial interactions among places. The method is validated with a case study using taxi trip data from Shanghai.

[1]  Markus Friedrich,et al.  Generating Origin–Destination Matrices from Mobile Phone Trajectories , 2010 .

[2]  H. Miller Tobler's First Law and Spatial Analysis , 2004 .

[3]  Charles Elkan,et al.  Expectation Maximization Algorithm , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[4]  Víctor Soto,et al.  Characterizing Urban Landscapes Using Geolocated Tweets , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[5]  B. Slack,et al.  The Geography of Transport Systems , 2006 .

[6]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Redrawing the Map of Great Britain from a Network of Human Interactions , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[8]  Chenghu Zhou,et al.  A new insight into land use classification based on aggregated mobile phone data , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Tian Lan,et al.  Zooming into individuals to understand the collective: A review of trajectory-based travel behaviour studies , 2014 .

[10]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Combining smart card data and household travel survey to analyze jobs-housing relationships in Beijing , 2013, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[11]  Chaogui Kang,et al.  Social Sensing: A New Approach to Understanding Our Socioeconomic Environments , 2015 .

[12]  Xing Xie,et al.  Urban computing with taxicabs , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[13]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[14]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  T. Geisel,et al.  The scaling laws of human travel , 2006, Nature.

[16]  M. Batty The New Science of Cities , 2013 .

[17]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Eigenplaces: Analysing Cities Using the Space–Time Structure of the Mobile Phone Network , 2009 .

[18]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility , 2010, Science.

[19]  Víctor Soto,et al.  Automated land use identification using cell-phone records , 2011, HotPlanet '11.

[20]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1985 .

[21]  Qingquan Li,et al.  Functionally critical locations in an urban transportation network: Identification and space-time analysis using taxi trajectories , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[22]  Liang Liu,et al.  Estimating Origin-Destination Flows Using Mobile Phone Location Data , 2011, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[23]  D. Brockmann,et al.  The Structure of Borders in a Small World , 2010, PLoS ONE.

[24]  Yong Gao,et al.  Uncovering Patterns of Inter-Urban Trip and Spatial Interaction from Social Media Check-In Data , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[26]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies , 2001 .

[27]  Victor Soto,et al.  Robust Land Use Characterization of Urban Landscapes using Cell Phone Data , 2011 .

[28]  Li Gong,et al.  Revealing travel patterns and city structure with taxi trip data , 2016 .

[29]  Dietmar Bauer,et al.  Inferring land use from mobile phone activity , 2012, UrbComp '12.

[30]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  Semantic trajectories modeling and analysis , 2013, CSUR.

[31]  Yu Liu,et al.  Human mobility patterns in different communities: a mobile phone data-based social network approach , 2015, Ann. GIS.

[32]  André Hardy,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1994 .

[33]  Lun Wu,et al.  Intra-Urban Human Mobility and Activity Transition: Evidence from Social Media Check-In Data , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Understanding Road Usage Patterns in Urban Areas , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Eigenplaces: Segmenting Space through Digital Signatures , 2010, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[36]  Xing Xie,et al.  Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs , 2012, KDD.

[37]  Fahui Wang,et al.  Urban land uses and traffic 'source-sink areas': Evidence from GPS-enabled taxi data in Shanghai , 2012 .

[38]  Michael Batty,et al.  Detecting the dynamics of urban structure through spatial network analysis , 2014, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..