An evaluation of gating window size, delivery method, and composite field dosimetry of respiratory-gated IMRT.

A respiratory gating system has been developed based on a commercial patient positioning system. The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of the gating system to reproduce normal, nongated IMRT operation and to quantify the errors produced by delivering a nongated IMRT treatment onto a moving target. A moving phantom capable of simultaneous two-dimensional motion was built, and an analytical liver motion function was used to drive the phantom. Studies were performed to assess the effect of gating window size and choice of delivery method (segmented and dynamic multileaf collimation). Additionally, two multiple field IMRT cases were delivered to quantify the error in gated and nongated IMRT with motion. Dosimetric error between nonmoving and moving deliveries is related to gating window size. By reducing the window size, the error can be reduced. Delivery error can be reduced for both dynamic and segmented delivery with gating. For the implementation of dynamic IMRT delivery in this study, dynamic delivery was found to generate larger delivery errors than segmented delivery in most cases studied. For multiple field IMRT delivery, the largest errors were generated in regions where high field modulation was present parallel to the axis of motion. Gating was found to reduce these large errors to clinically acceptable levels.

[1]  K. Brock,et al.  Determination of ventilatory liver movement via radiographic evaluation of diaphragm position. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  T LoSasso,et al.  Treatment planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary nasopharynx cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  C C Ling,et al.  Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  H D Kubo,et al.  Compatibility of Varian 2100C gated operations with enhanced dynamic wedge and IMRT dose delivery. , 2000, Medical physics.

[5]  R. Mohan,et al.  Motion adaptive x-ray therapy: a feasibility study , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  D A Low,et al.  Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: The Mallinckrodt experience , 2000, International journal of cancer.

[7]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Real-time three-dimensional motion analysis for patient positioning verification. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  G Starkschall,et al.  Respiratory-driven lung tumor motion is independent of tumor size, tumor location, and pulmonary function. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[10]  R Mohan,et al.  Determining parameters for respiration-gated radiotherapy. , 2001, Medical physics.

[11]  D A Jaffray,et al.  The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of dynamic intensity modulation. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  C C Ling,et al.  High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[13]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  C. Ramsey,et al.  A comparison of beam characteristics for gated and nongated clinical x-ray beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[15]  E. Larsen,et al.  A method for incorporating organ motion due to breathing into 3D dose calculations. , 1999, Medical physics.

[16]  D A Low,et al.  A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms. , 1998, Medical physics.