The Efficient Descent Advisor: Technology Validation and Transition

NASA recently completed the development and testing of the Efficient Descent Advisor (EDA) ‐ a trajectory-based tool for en route air traffic controllers that computes Optimized Profile Descent (OPD) solutions designed to minimize aircraft fuel consumption and associated carbon dioxide emissions while maximizing airspace throughput. EDA was developed and refined through a series of high fidelity Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) simulations, carried out in a three-year effort with the FAA and Boeing known as 3D-Path Arrival Management (3D-PAM). A final simulation was carried out to assess potential benefits using a prototype that reflected a culmination of previous design decisions. The simulation compared EDA against baseline operations in which controllers were provided with scheduling automation alone, representing metering operations today. For added fidelity, the simulation included models of trajectory prediction uncertainty. Results showed that EDA enabled a 92% improvement in the accuracy by which controllers delivered aircraft to the terminal airspace boundary in conformance with metering schedules. In addition, with EDA, controllers were able to accommodate overtake maneuvers en route without adjustments to the optimal arrival sequence. Furthermore, EDA was shown to reduce fuel consumption in transition airspace by 110 lbs per flight, averaged for all aircraft types and traffic scenarios, with substantially more fuel savings observed for busier traffic conditions and larger aircraft types. Reductions in controller workload were also observed along with a 60% reduction in the number of required maneuver instructions between controllers and pilots. Results from this simulation and previous experiments, together with prototype software and design specifications, were delivered to the FAA for transitioning EDA towards operational deployment.

[1]  Gano Broto Chatterji,et al.  Fuel Burn Estimation Using Real Track Data , 2011 .

[2]  Thomas Prevot,et al.  MACS: A Simulation Platform for Today's and Tomorrow's Air Traffic Operations , 2007 .

[3]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Design and evaluation , 1995 .

[4]  Barry E. Schwartz,et al.  Accuracy of RUC-1 and RUC-2 Wind and Aircraft Trajectory Forecasts by Comparison with ACARS Observations , 2000 .

[5]  Jane Thipphavong,et al.  Design Considerations for a New Terminal Area Arrival Scheduler , 2010 .

[6]  F.A. Navarro,et al.  Continuous descent approaches for maximum predictability , 2007, 2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[7]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  John E. Robinson,et al.  Benefits of Continuous Descent Operations in High-Density Terminal Airspace Under Scheduling Constraints , 2010 .

[9]  Richard Coppenbarger,et al.  Field Evaluation of the Tailored Arrivals Concept for Datalink-Enabled Continuous Descent Approach , 2009 .

[10]  Heinz Erzberger Design principles and algorithms for automated air traffic management , 1995 .

[11]  Peter Brooker,et al.  SESAR and NextGen: Investing In New Paradigms , 2008, Journal of Navigation.

[12]  Lynne Martin,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the Terminal Area Precision Scheduling and Spacing System , 2011 .

[13]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[14]  William Chan,et al.  FIELD TEST EVALUATION OF THE CTAS CONFLICT PREDICTION AND TRIAL PLANNING CAPABILITY , 1998 .

[15]  Laurel Stell Prediction of Top of Descent Location for Idle-thrust Descents , 2011 .

[16]  Boeing,et al.  ARRIVAL MANAGEMENT WITH REQUIRED NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE AND 3D PATHS , 2007 .

[17]  Harry N. Swenson,et al.  Design and Operational Evaluation of the Traffic Management Advisor at the Ft. Worth Air Route Traffic Control Center , 1997 .