Correction: Evolution and Translation of Research Findings: From Bench to Where?

In PLoS Clinical Trials, vol 1, issue 7: doi:10.1371/journal.pctr.0010036 In Box 2, Reference [52] should be corrected to [22]. References [18-21] in the text should be corrected to [18-22]. The six successive references from [22] to [27] in the text should be corrected to [23] to [28]. Finally, the current reference [28] in the text should be corrected to [14].

[1]  M. Brown,et al.  A Randomised Controlled Trial of Vitamin E in Patients with Coronary Disease: The Cambridge Heart Antioxidant Study (CHAOS) , 1996 .

[2]  G. Donnan,et al.  1,026 Experimental treatments in acute stroke , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[3]  J. Ioannidis Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. , 2005, JAMA.

[4]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[6]  R. Recker,et al.  The Association of Bone Mineral Density with Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  P. Jais How frequent is altered gene expression among susceptibility genes to human complex disorders? , 2005, Genetics in Medicine.

[8]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Randomised trials comparing chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: biases and evolution over time. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Eric J Topol,et al.  Failing the public health--rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B Djulbegovic,et al.  Acceptable regret in medical decision making. , 1999, Medical hypotheses.

[11]  Rachel Churchill,et al.  Effect sizes in cumulative meta-analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  R. Matthews,et al.  What are the implications of optimism bias in clinical research? , 2006, The Lancet.

[13]  A. Hofman,et al.  Promoter and 3'-untranslated-region haplotypes in the vitamin d receptor gene predispose to osteoporotic fracture: the rotterdam study. , 2005, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals , 2005, The Lancet.

[15]  J. Marshall,et al.  PRECLINICAL MODELS OF SHOCK AND SEPSIS: WHAT CAN THEY TELL US? , 2005, Shock.

[16]  J. Eisman,et al.  Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles , 1994, Nature.

[17]  John Hoey,et al.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. , 2005, Circulation.

[18]  Richard Smith,et al.  Patient Safety Requires a New Way to Publish Clinical Trials , 2006, PLoS clinical trials.

[19]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. , 2002, JAMA.

[20]  F. Marincola Translational Medicine: A two-way road , 2003, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[21]  T C Chalmers,et al.  Changes in clinical trials mandated by the advent of meta-analysis. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  G. Donnan,et al.  Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of the Efficacy of FK506 in Experimental Stroke , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[23]  Thomas A Trikalinos,et al.  Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence? , 2004, The Lancet.

[25]  J. Attia,et al.  Haplotype analysis of VDR gene polymorphisms: a meta-analysis , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  M. Jennions,et al.  Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  David W Howells,et al.  Pooling of Animal Experimental Data Reveals Influence of Study Design and Publication Bias , 2004, Stroke.

[28]  Franz Porzsolt,et al.  The fading of reported effectiveness. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[29]  H. Straatman,et al.  Evaluation of treatment regimens to cure Helicobacter pylori infection—a meta‐analysis , 1999, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[30]  Ján,et al.  Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial. The Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. , 1995, JAMA.

[31]  Stefan Leucht,et al.  Why olanzapine beats risperidone, risperidone beats quetiapine, and quetiapine beats olanzapine: an exploratory analysis of head-to-head comparison studies of second-generation antipsychotics. , 2006, The American journal of psychiatry.

[32]  H S Sacks,et al.  The relationship between study design, results, and reporting of randomized clinical trials of HIV infection. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[33]  The Clinical Interpretation of Research , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[34]  R Smith,et al.  Comroe and Dripps revisited. , 1987, British medical journal.

[35]  Manfred Hauben,et al.  Data mining in pharmacovigilance: lessons from phantom ships , 2006, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[36]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressants: comparison of drug adherence. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[37]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Concordance of functional in vitro data and epidemiological associations in complex disease genetics , 2006, Genetics in Medicine.

[38]  R. Simes,et al.  Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects , 1997, BMJ.

[39]  J. Ioannidis Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. , 1998, JAMA.

[40]  J. H. Comroe,et al.  Scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. , 1976, Science.

[41]  Kennon Heard,et al.  Emergency medicine animal research: does use of randomization and blinding affect the results? , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[42]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[43]  A. Uitterlinden,et al.  The Association between Common Vitamin D Receptor Gene Variations and Osteoporosis: A Participant-Level Meta-Analysis , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[44]  D. Altman,et al.  Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[45]  Paul R. Rosenbaum,et al.  Replicating Effects and Biases , 2001 .

[46]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Factors That Can Affect the External Validity of Randomised Controlled Trials , 2006, PLoS clinical trials.

[47]  Matthew B Schabath,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Screening in Molecular Cancer Epidemiology , 2004, Cancer Research.

[48]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Translation of highly promising basic science research into clinical applications. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[49]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research , 2006, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[50]  Richard Horton,et al.  Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers , 1996, The Lancet.

[51]  L. Gluud Bias in clinical intervention research. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[52]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Evolution of treatment effects over time: empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.