No evidence of magnitude clustering in an aftershock sequence of nano- and picoseismicity.

One of the hallmarks of our current understanding of seismicity as highlighted by the epidemic-type-aftershock sequence model is that the magnitudes of earthquakes are independent of one another and can be considered as randomly drawn from the Gutenberg-Richter distribution. This assumption forms the basis of many approaches for forecasting seismicity rates and hazard assessment. Recently, it has been suggested that the assumption of independent magnitudes is not valid. It was subsequently argued that this conclusion was not supported by the original earthquake data from California. One of the main challenges is the lack of completeness of earthquake catalogs. Here, we study an aftershock sequence of nano- and picoseismicity as observed at the Mponeng mine, for which the issue of incompleteness is much less pronounced. We show that this sequence does not exhibit any significant evidence of magnitude correlations.

[1]  Gaetano Festa,et al.  Earthquake magnitude estimation from early radiated energy , 2008 .

[2]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Space- and Time-Dependent Probabilities for Earthquake Fault Systems from Numerical Simulations: Feasibility Study and First Results , 2010 .

[3]  L de Arcangelis,et al.  Influence of time and space correlations on earthquake magnitude. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[4]  G. Dresen,et al.  Observation of Seismic Events with Frequencies f > 25 kHz at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa , 2010 .

[5]  Aldo Zollo,et al.  Earthquake magnitude estimation from peak amplitudes of very early seismic signals on strong motion records , 2006 .

[6]  Jiancang Zhuang,et al.  Space–time ETAS models and an improved extension , 2006 .

[7]  Yasuo Yabe,et al.  Twenty Thousand Aftershocks of a Very Small (M 2) Earthquake and Their Relation to the Mainshock Rupture and Geological Structures , 2011 .

[8]  J. Vidale,et al.  Seismicity rate immediately before and after main shock rupture from high-frequency waveforms in Japan , 2007 .

[9]  Maya Paczuski,et al.  Analysis of the spatial distribution between successive earthquakes. , 2005 .

[10]  John B. Rundle,et al.  BASS, an alternative to ETAS , 2007 .

[11]  Peter Grassberger,et al.  Earthquake recurrence as a record breaking process , 2006 .

[12]  Richard M. Allen,et al.  The deterministic nature of earthquake rupture , 2005, Nature.

[13]  Changjiang Wu,et al.  Comment on “Earthquake magnitude estimation from peak amplitudes of very early seismic signals on strong motion records” by Aldo Zollo, Maria Lancieri, and Stefan Nielsen , 2007 .

[14]  Maya Paczuski,et al.  Complex networks of earthquakes and aftershocks , 2004, physics/0408018.

[15]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[16]  G. Dresen,et al.  Source Parameters of Picoseismicity Recorded at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa: Implications for Scaling Relations , 2011 .

[17]  Eugenio Lippiello,et al.  Dynamical scaling in branching models for seismicity. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[18]  P. Rydelek,et al.  Earth science: Is earthquake rupture deterministic? , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Jörn Davidsen,et al.  Are earthquake magnitudes clustered? , 2011, Physical review letters.

[20]  Y. Kagan.  Short-Term Properties of Earthquake Catalogs and Models of Earthquake Source , 2004 .

[21]  Kristy F. Tiampo,et al.  A RELM earthquake forecast based on pattern informatics , 2005 .

[22]  Ian G. Main,et al.  Is the reliable prediction of individual earthquakes a realistic scientific goal , 1999 .

[23]  Remo Guidieri.  Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[24]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Comparison of Short-Term and Time-Independent Earthquake Forecast Models for Southern California , 2006 .

[25]  J. Negendank,et al.  New Frontiers in Integrated Solid Earth Sciences , 2010 .

[26]  M. Wyss,et al.  Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan , 2000 .

[27]  Ilya Zaliapin,et al.  Clustering analysis of seismicity and aftershock identification. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[28]  Hiroshi Ogasawara,et al.  Observation of numerous aftershocks of an Mw 1.9 earthquake with an AE network installed in a deep gold mine in South Africa , 2009 .

[29]  Peter Grassberger,et al.  Networks of recurrent events, a theory of records, and an application to finding causal signatures in seismicity. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Zhigang Peng,et al.  Migration of early aftershocks following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake , 2009 .

[31]  Zhigang Peng,et al.  Anomalous early aftershock decay rate of the 2004 Mw6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake , 2006 .

[32]  D Sornette,et al.  Diffusion of epicenters of earthquake aftershocks, Omori's law, and generalized continuous-time random walk models. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  K. Felzer,et al.  Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress , 2006, Nature.

[34]  Danijel Schorlemmer,et al.  First Results of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models Experiment , 2010 .

[35]  D. Marsan,et al.  Extending Earthquakes' Reach Through Cascading , 2008, Science.

[36]  David R. Shelly,et al.  Periodic, Chaotic, and Doubled Earthquake Recurrence Intervals on the Deep San Andreas Fault , 2010, Science.

[37]  Yasuo Yabe,et al.  Frequency-Magnitude Characteristics Down to Magnitude -4.4 for Induced Seismicity Recorded at Mponeng Gold Mine, South Africa , 2010 .

[38]  Alvaro Corral.  Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in the temporal occurrence of earthquakes. , 2004, Physical review letters.