Understanding the dynamics of scaffold-mediated signaling

Many signaling networks involve scaffold proteins that bind multiple kinases in kinase cascades. While scaffolds play a fundamental role in regulating signaling, few hypotheses regarding their function have been rigorously examined. Here, we used dynamical models of scaffold signaling to investigate the impact scaffolds have on network behavior. We considered two paradigms of scaffold assembly: as either the nucleation point for assembly of discrete multi-subunit proteins (the machine paradigm) or a platform upon which kinases independently associate (the ensemble paradigm). We found that several well-accepted hypotheses regarding the role of scaffolds in regulating signal response either do not hold or depend critically on the assembly paradigm employed. In addition to providing novel insights into the function of scaffold proteins, our work suggests experiments that could distinguish between assembly paradigms. Our findings should also inform attempts to target scaffold proteins for therapeutic intervention and the design of scaffolds for synthetic biology.

[1]  W. R. Burack,et al.  Signal transduction: hanging on a scaffold. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Combinatorial Complexity and Compositional Drift in Protein Interaction Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  A. Bashan,et al.  Correlating ribosome function with high-resolution structures. , 2008, Trends in microbiology.

[4]  Anand R Asthagiri,et al.  Quantitative effect of scaffold abundance on signal propagation , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[5]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Machines vs. Ensembles: Effective MAPK Signaling through Heterogeneous Sets of Protein Complexes , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Susan S. Taylor,et al.  Mutation that blocks ATP binding creates a pseudokinase stabilizing the scaffolding function of kinase suppressor of Ras, CRAF and BRAF , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway , 2004, Peptides.

[8]  Christopher D. Thompson-Walsh,et al.  Graphs, Rewriting and Pathway Reconstruction for Rule-Based Models , 2012, FSTTCS.

[9]  Henrik G. Dohlman,et al.  Pheromone Signaling Mechanisms in Yeast: A Prototypical Sex Machine , 2004, Science.

[10]  G. Sprague,,et al.  Identification and regulation of a gene required for cell fusion during mating of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[11]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Scaffold-mediated nucleation of protein signaling complexes: elementary principles. , 2011, Mathematical biosciences.

[12]  E. S. Klimenko,et al.  Single-Cell Analysis Reveals That Insulation Maintains Signaling Specificity Between Two Yeast MAPK Pathways with Common Components , 2010, Science Signaling.

[13]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Leslie M Loew,et al.  Molecular machines or pleiomorphic ensembles: signaling complexes revisited , 2009, Journal of biology.

[15]  Wen Zheng,et al.  Dynamic studies of scaffold-dependent mating pathway in yeast. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Michael Hucka,et al.  A Correction to the Review Titled "Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems" by W. S. Hlavacek et al. , 2006, Science's STKE.

[17]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Input–output behavior of ErbB signaling pathways as revealed by a mass action model trained against dynamic data , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[18]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Fundamental trade-offs between information flow in single cells and cellular populations , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  A. Harding,et al.  KSR1 Modulates the Sensitivity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway Activation in T Cells without Altering Fundamental System Outputs , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  J. Thorner,et al.  Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[22]  Ucheor B Choi,et al.  Reconstitution of multivalent PDZ domain binding to the scaffold protein PSD-95 reveals ternary-complex specificity of combinatorial inhibition. , 2014, Structure.

[23]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Scalable Simulation of Cellular Signaling Networks , 2007, APLAS.

[24]  Drew Endy,et al.  Scaffold number in yeast signaling system sets tradeoff between system output and dynamic range , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rapid Diversification of Cell Signaling Phenotypes by Modular Domain Recombination , 2010, Science.

[26]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  Creating and analyzing pathway and protein interaction compendia for modelling signal transduction networks , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[27]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Scaffold Proteins: Hubs for Controlling the Flow of Cellular Information , 2011, Science.

[28]  Jehoshua Bruck,et al.  Scaffold proteins may biphasically affect the levels of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and reduce its threshold properties. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[30]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  S. Peisajovich,et al.  The Robustness of a Signaling Complex to Domain Rearrangements Facilitates Network Evolution , 2014, PLoS biology.

[32]  A. Chakraborty,et al.  Scaffold proteins confer diverse regulatory properties to protein kinase cascades , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  C. Bashor,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Using Engineered Scaffold Interactions to Reshape Map Kinase Pathway Signaling Dynamics , 2022 .

[34]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Crosstalk and the evolvability of intracellular communication , 2017, Nature Communications.

[35]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Crosstalk and competition in signaling networks. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[36]  L. Bardwell,et al.  Mechanisms of MAPK signalling specificity. , 2006, Biochemical Society transactions.

[37]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Rule-Based Modelling of Cellular Signalling , 2007, CONCUR.

[38]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rewiring MAP Kinase Pathways Using Alternative Scaffold Assembly Mechanisms , 2003, Science.

[39]  J. Gerhart,et al.  The theory of facilitated variation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.