Effects of Technology Flows on Industrial Performance: The Contingent Role of Diversity of R&D Human Capital

ABSTRACT Purpose: Given the growth in technology transactions on business marketing, there is an imperative need for a comprehensive understanding of business marketing issues in technology balance of payment (TBP). Earlier studies focused on the consequences of technology inflows to industrial organizations when referring to technology flow; thus, effects of technology outflows have not been considered and only half of the technology flows are studied. Thus the authors have conducted a comprehensive study to answer the following questions: (a) What are the effects of exporting and importing technology in terms of outflows and inflows on performance? (b) How does the extent of diversity of R&D human capital moderate the relationship between technology outflows and performance? (c) How does the extent of diversity of R&D human capital moderate the relationship between technology inflows and performance? Methodology/approach: This study consists of an industry-level, 9-year longitudinal analysis on the effects of technology outflows and inflows on industrial performance. Data from the “National Science and Technology Activity Survey, 2001–2009” and “Yearbook of Industrial Production Statistics, 2002–2010” were used for data on technology outflows, technology inflows, and productivity. We used conventional panel data methods (fixed- and random-effects regression) to test the hypotheses and also used two-dimensional simulated diagrams to illustrate the shape of the relationship between technology outflows and technology inflows on industrial production performance, and to show how the relationships might be moderated by diversity of R&D human capital. Findings: The framework contributes to the literature by understanding different technology outflows and inflows of a context in business marketing research. The relationships we explored in this study expand our understanding of the sources of industrial competiveness. Our study suggests some of the important underlying factors to understand the positive effects of technology outflows and inflows on performance. Our results also suggest that industries that are at lower levels of technology outflows and inflows are likely to improve performance if they devote more diversity of R&D human capital in transaction activities. This study also provides important managerial implications for practitioners by offering a comprehensive understanding of how technology marketing practices are operated in Taiwan. Originality/value/contribution. Most studies have focused on the inflows of technology, but the outflows still lack sufficient attention, especially the dynamic process of technology management. This article attempts to relate specifically export and import of technology to the performance. We also provide insight into the diversity of R&D human capital to verify the moderate effect of the relationship between technology outflows, inflows and performance.

[1]  J. Hausman Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[2]  Y. Mundlak On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data , 1978 .

[3]  A. Jacquemin,et al.  Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth , 1979 .

[4]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[5]  Bernadette Madeuf,et al.  International technology transfers and international technology payments: Definitions, measurement and firms' behaviour , 1984 .

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[7]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[9]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth , 1990 .

[10]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[11]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[12]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[13]  J. Pfeffer Competitive Advantage Through People , 1994 .

[14]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[15]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[16]  A. Arora,et al.  The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of , 1994 .

[17]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[18]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs , 1994 .

[19]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The Handbook of Industrial Innovation , 1994 .

[20]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[22]  L. H. Pelled Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[23]  J. Barney Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[24]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[25]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER , REALLY ? , 1997 .

[26]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[27]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[28]  Arjen van Witteloostuijn,et al.  Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution , 1998 .

[29]  J. Barney,et al.  On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage , 1998 .

[30]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[31]  A. van Witteloostuijn,et al.  Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution , 1998 .

[32]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[33]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[34]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry , 1999 .

[35]  Slavo Radosevic,et al.  International technology transfer and catch-up in economic development , 1999 .

[36]  G. Shapiro Employee involvement: opening the diversity Pandora’s Box? , 2000 .

[37]  Joshua S. Gans,et al.  When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit?: Evidence from the SBIR program* , 2000 .

[38]  P. Paulus Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups , 2000 .

[39]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[40]  Jennifer W. Spencer,et al.  How Relevant is University-Based Scientific Research to Private High-Technology Firms? A United States–Japan Comparison , 2001 .

[41]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[42]  M. Schulz THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[43]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes , 2001 .

[44]  Shih-Chang Hung,et al.  Mobilising networks to achieve strategic difference , 2002 .

[45]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Do alliances promote knowledge flows , 2006 .

[46]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[47]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[48]  Raymond P. M. Chow,et al.  In Search of Complementarity , 2002 .

[49]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach , 2003 .

[51]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Quality Improvement and Infrastructure Activity Costs in Software Development: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[52]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[53]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[54]  Z. Ács,et al.  The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[55]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[56]  Niels G. Noorderhaven,et al.  Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govindarajan's typology of subsidiary roles , 2006, International Business Review.

[57]  A. Geuna,et al.  Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling , 2006 .

[58]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An examination of the investments in U.S. biotechnology firms by foreign and domestic corporate partners , 2006 .

[59]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms , 2006 .

[60]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[61]  S. Kotha,et al.  Knowledge Creation Through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Industry , 2006 .

[62]  D. Teece Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation" , 2006 .

[63]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993-2003 , 2006 .

[64]  W. A. Spivey,et al.  Take a Portfolio View of CRADAs , 2006 .

[65]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[66]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[67]  Dana Minbaeva,et al.  Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations , 2007 .

[68]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[69]  Dovev Lavie Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software Industry , 2007 .

[70]  W. H. Hoffmann Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances , 2007 .

[71]  P. Mendi Trade in disembodied technology and total factor productivity in OECD countries , 2007 .

[72]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[73]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Determinants of Alliance Portfolio Complexity and its Effect on Innovative Performance of Companies , 2008 .

[74]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  The gloomy side of embeddedness: The effects of overembeddedness on inter-firm partnership formation , 2008 .

[75]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[76]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Outbound Open Innovation and its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences , 2009 .

[77]  Kuen-Hung Tsai,et al.  Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective , 2009 .

[78]  Jaideep Anand,et al.  The Dynamics of Multimarket Competition in Exploration and Exploitation Activities , 2009 .

[79]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[80]  Fang-Ming Hsu,et al.  The effect of government-sponsored R&D programmes on additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan , 2009 .

[81]  U. Wassmer,et al.  Alliance Portfolios: A Review and Research Agenda , 2010 .

[82]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH , 2010 .

[83]  Yi-Fen Huang,et al.  The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation , 2010 .

[84]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Determinants of Alliance Portfolio Complexity and Its Effect on Innovative Performance of Companies , 2011 .

[85]  Kari Kristinsson,et al.  Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation , 2011 .

[86]  Brian H. Rudall,et al.  Changing technology , 2011, Kybernetes.

[87]  David Jacobson,et al.  Knowledge Transfer and Technology Diffusion , 2011 .

[88]  Luca Berchicci,et al.  Heterogeneity and Intensity of R&D Partnership in Italian Manufacturing Firms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[89]  Abiodun Egbetokun,et al.  Innovation Systems and Capabilities in Developing Regions: Concepts, Issues and Cases , 2012 .

[90]  Mike Wright,et al.  Technology transfer in a global economy , 2012 .

[91]  Douglas B. Fuller,et al.  Technology Transfer Between the US, China and Taiwan : Moving Knowledge , 2013 .

[92]  Sorin M. S. Krammer Assessing the Relative Importance of Multiple Channels for Embodied and Disembodied Technological Spillovers , 2013 .

[93]  J. Wooldridge Introduction to Econometrics , 2013 .

[94]  M. Weisz Econometric Analysis Of Panel Data , 2016 .

[95]  '. Donnamariedecarolis The Impact of Stocks and Flows of Organizational Knowledge on Firm Performance : An Empirical Investigation of the Biotechnology Industry , 2017 .

[96]  Jennifer M Talarico,et al.  A review of 40 years of research , 2018 .