Structural effects of R&D collaboration network on knowledge diffusion performance

With the advent of knowledge-based economy, the process and structure of knowledge diffusion mechanism in R&D collaboration networks have become more complex and dynamic. However, regardless of the complexity and importance of these R&D collaboration networks, previous empirical analyses have focused mainly on statics, which cannot be a sufficient basis to thoroughly explore knowledge diffusion in the R&D collaboration network. Furthermore, there has been little research done on the relationship between knowledge diffusion and the structure of an R&D collaboration network. Hence, this paper modeled knowledge diffusion based on social network analysis. It also investigated the impact of network structure on the performance of knowledge diffusion, focusing on average knowledge stock and knowledge variance. The results confirm that the small-world network is the most efficient and equitable structure toward effective knowledge diffusion.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[3]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[4]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[5]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Dileep R. Sule,et al.  Effect of learning and forgetting on economic lot size scheduling problem , 1983 .

[7]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing , 1991 .

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  P. Cooke.  Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[10]  J. Niosi.  National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners , 2002 .

[11]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[12]  P. Romer.  Idea gaps and object gaps in economic development , 1993 .

[13]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Linda Argote,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Microstructure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer Through Learning by Doing , 1996, Oper. Res..

[15]  Markus Balzat,et al.  Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems , 2004 .

[16]  Timothy L. Smunt,et al.  The impact of worker forgetting on production scheduling , 1987 .

[17]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  Knowledge interaction towards inclusive learning: Promoting systems of innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[18]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[19]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[20]  M. Jackson,et al.  A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks , 1996 .

[21]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[22]  R. Nelson.  THE STRENGTH OF STRONG TIES: SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INTERGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1989 .

[23]  E. B. Viotti.  National Learning Systems - A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea , 2002 .

[24]  Nicolas Jonard,et al.  Knowledge Dynamics in a Network Industry , 2004 .

[25]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  Learning from Neighbors , 1995 .

[26]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Frédéric Deroïan.  Formation of social networks and diffusion of innovations , 2002 .

[28]  Lisa A. Keister,et al.  WHERE DO STRONG TIES COME FROM? A DYAD ANALYSIS OF THE STRENGTH OF INTERFIRM EXCHANGE RELATIONS DURING CHINA'S ECONOMIC TRANSITION , 1999 .

[29]  S. Goyal,et al.  Learning from neighbours , 1998 .

[30]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  The Small worlds of Strategic Technology Alliances , 2004 .

[31]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[32]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[33]  M. Chwe.  Communication and Coordination in Social Networks , 2000 .

[34]  Lorenzo Cassi,et al.  The opportunity cost of social relations: On the effectiveness of small worlds , 2008 .

[35]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[36]  B. Dousset.  Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry , 2005 .

[37]  Simon Rodan,et al.  More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness , 2004 .

[38]  Qiying Hu,et al.  Collaboration in R&D activities: Firm-specific decisions , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems : the role of governances in a globalized world , 1998 .

[40]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  Thomas F. Brantle,et al.  Complex Knowledge Networks and Invention Collaboration , 2008 .

[42]  Richard Taylor,et al.  Knowledge diffusion dynamics and network properties of face-to-face interactions , 2004 .

[43]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[44]  Devanathan Sudharshan,et al.  DiffuNET: The impact of network structure on diffusion of innovation , 2005 .