Assessing Degree of Novelty of Products to Ascertain Innovative Products

Substantial increase in competition compels design firms to develop new products at an increasingly rapid pace. This situation pressurizes engineering teams to develop better products and at the same time develop products faster [1]. Continuous innovation is a key factor to enable a company to generate profit on a continued basis, through the introduction of new products in the market – a prime intention for Product Lifecycle Management. Creativity, affecting a wide spectrum of business portfolios, is regarded as the crucial factor for designing products. A central goal of product development is to create products that are sufficiently novel and useful. This research focuses on the determination of novelty of engineering products. Determination of novelty is important for ascertaining the newness of a product, to decide on the patentability of the design, to compare designers' capability of solving problems and to ascertain the potential market of a product. Few attempts at measuring novelty is available in literature [2, 3, 4], but more in-depth research is required for assessing degree of novelty of products. This research aims to determine the novelty of a product by enabling a person to determine the degree of novelty in a product. A measure of novelty has been developed by which the degree of ''novelty'' of products can be ascertained. An empirical study has been conducted to determine the validity of this method for determining the 'novelty' of the products.

[1]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[2]  Amaresh Chakrabarti.  Towards hybrid methods for synthesis , 2001 .

[3]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[4]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[5]  Rob Saunders,et al.  Curious Design Agents and Artificial Creativity - A Synthetic Approach to the Study of Creative Behaviour , 2001 .

[6]  Kenneth N. Brown,et al.  AI in Design , 1994 .

[7]  C. J. Moore,et al.  Practical Knowledge-Based Systems in Conceptual Design , 1993 .

[8]  Y.-M. Deng,et al.  Function and behavior representation in conceptual mechanical design , 2002, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[9]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[10]  Larry W. Zimmerman,et al.  Value Engineering : A Practical Approach For Owners, Designers And Contractors , 1988 .

[11]  Ashok K. Goel.  Design, Analogy, and Creativity , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[12]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[13]  R. Sternberg.  Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[14]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A MEASURE FOR ASSESSING PRODUCT NOVELTY , 2003 .

[15]  John S. Gero,et al.  Function–behavior–structure paths and their role in analogy-based design , 1996, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[16]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[17]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler , 1996, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[18]  B. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Functional Representation and Causal Processes , 1994, Adv. Comput..