Dissociating vision and visual attention in the human pulvinar.

The pulvinar region of the thalamus has repeatedly been linked with the control of attention. However, the functions of the pulvinar remain poorly characterized, both in human and in nonhuman primates. In a functional MRI study, we examined the relative contributions to activity in the human posterior pulvinar made by visual drive (the presence of an unattended visual stimulus) and attention (covert spatial attention to the stimulus). In an event-related design, large optic flow stimuli were presented to the left and/or right of a central fixation point. When unattended, the stimuli robustly activated two regions of the pulvinar, one medial and one dorsal with respect to the lateral geniculate. The activity in both regions shows a strong contralateral bias, suggesting retinotopic organization. Primate physiology suggests that the two regions could be two portions of the same double map of the visual field. In our paradigm, attending to the stimulus enhanced the response by about 20%. Thus attention is not necessary to activate the human pulvinar and the degree of attentional enhancement matches, but does not exceed, that seen in the cortical regions with which the posterior pulvinar connects.

[1]  J Miller,et al.  Visual responses of single neurons in the caudal lateral pulvinar of the macaque monkey , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Retinotopic organization of macaque pulvinar. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Receptive-field properties of neurons in the macaque inferior pulvinar. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  L. Benevento,et al.  The organization of connections between the pulvinar and visual area MT in the macaque monkey , 1983, Brain Research.

[5]  S. Petersen,et al.  Pulvinar nuclei of the behaving rhesus monkey: visual responses and their modulation. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  S. Petersen,et al.  Contributions of the pulvinar to visual spatial attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  S E Petersen,et al.  Visual responses of pulvinar and collicular neurons during eye movements of awake, trained macaques. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  S. Petersen,et al.  The pulvinar and visual salience , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  B. C. Motter Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Alexander M. Harner,et al.  Task-dependent influences of attention on the activation of human primary visual cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[13]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  K. Grieve,et al.  The primate pulvinar nuclei: vision and action , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  J. Sanes,et al.  Improved Detection of Event-Related Functional MRI Signals Using Probability Functions , 2001, NeuroImage.

[19]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Effect of attentive fixation in macaque thalamus and cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  N Fujita,et al.  Lateral geniculate nucleus: anatomic and functional identification by use of MR imaging. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Yantis,et al.  Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  S Shipp,et al.  The functional logic of cortico-pulvinar connections. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  S. Shipp Shipp pulvinar connections − The functional logic of cortico , 2003 .

[26]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Functional imaging of the human lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  S. Shipp The brain circuitry of attention , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Pattern–motion selectivity in the human pulvinar , 2005, NeuroImage.

[29]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Reliable identification of the auditory thalamus using multi-modal structural analyses , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  P. Cotton,et al.  Contralateral visual hemifield representations in the human pulvinar nucleus. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.