Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception?

The conclusion that scene knowledge interacts with object perception depends on evidence that object detection is facilitated by consistent scene context. Experiment 1 replicated the I. Biederman, R. J. Mezzanotte, and J. C. Rabinowitz (1982) object-detection paradigm. Detection performance was higher for semantically consistent versus inconsistent objects. However, when the paradigm was modified to control for response bias (Experiments 2 and 3) or when response bias was eliminated by means of a forced-choice procedure (Experiment 4), no such advantage obtained. When an additional source of biasing information was eliminated by presenting the object label after the scene (Experiments 3 and 4), there was either no effect of consistency (Experiment 4) or an inconsistent object advantage (Experiment 3). These results suggest that object perception is not facilitated by consistent scene context.

[1]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[2]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[3]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  R. Gregory.  The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[5]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  I. Biederman.  Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.

[7]  I. Biederman,et al.  Searching for objects in real-world scences. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[9]  tephen E. Palmer.  The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[10]  R. E. Parker,et al.  Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[11]  J M Mandler,et al.  Some of the thousand words a picture is worth. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[12]  M. Potter.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[13]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  A. Friedman.  Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Computation and cognition: issues in the foundations of cognitive science , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[18]  Richard L. Metzger,et al.  Processing global information in briefly presented pictures , 1981, Psychological research.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[20]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  G. Loftus,et al.  Differential Acquisition Rates for Different Types of Information from Pictures , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  Richard L. Metzger,et al.  The nature of processing early in picture perception , 1983, Psychological research.

[23]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[25]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[26]  K. Rayner,et al.  The effect of background information on object identification , 2017 .

[27]  P. de Graef,et al.  Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification , 1990, Psychological research.

[28]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Identification of objects in scenes: the role of scene background in object naming. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  J. Henderson.  Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[31]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  A critique of pure vision , 1993 .

[32]  Bruno A. Olshausen,et al.  Dynamic routing strategies in sensory, motor, and cognitive processing , 1994 .

[33]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain , 1994 .

[34]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and Brain , 1994 .

[35]  G. Kane.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[36]  Horace Barlow,et al.  What is the computational goal of the neocortex , 1994 .

[37]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[38]  B. Gibson,et al.  Must Figure-Ground Organization Precede Object Recognition? An Assumption in Peril , 1994 .

[39]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  David Mumford,et al.  Neuronal Architectures for Pattern-theoretic Problems , 1995 .

[42]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[43]  S. Ullman.  High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition , 1996 .

[44]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .

[45]  G. Underwood.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[46]  J. Henderson,et al.  High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[47]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[48]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[49]  J. Henderson,et al.  Semantic Informativeness Mediates the Detection of Changes in Natural Scenes , 2000 .