Historical Scientific Analog Data: Life Sciences Faculty's Perspectives on Management, Reuse and Preservation

Older data in paper or analog format (e.g., field/lab notebooks, photos, maps) held in labs, offices, and archives across research institutions are an often overlooked resource for potential reuse in new scientific studies. However, there are few mechanisms to help researchers find existing analog data in order to reuse it. Yet, in the literature, reuse of historical data is particularly important in studies of biodiversity and climate change. We surveyed life science researchers at the University of Minnesota to understand and explore current and potential future use of historical data, attitudes around sharing and reusing data, and preservation of the data. Large amounts of historical data existed on our campus. Most researchers had reused or shared it, and many continued to add to their data sets. Some data had been scanned, over half of researchers have re-keyed some of their data into machine-readable format, and nearly all that were converted to a digital format were stored on unstable platforms and legacy formats. Researchers also expressed concerns about long-term preservation plans, or who to contact for assistance in planning for the future of the data, since much of these data are at risk for loss. Currently produced digital data sets are subject to guidelines and requirements developed at a national level. Solutions for historical analog data could benefit from a similar high-level treatment, and it will take experts from various fields to lead this effort. Given libraries’ expertise in data management and preservation, librarians are in a position to collaborate on devising cross-disciplinary solutions.

[1]  T. Aarup,et al.  Sea level data archaeology and the Global Sea Level Observing System (GLOSS) , 2015 .

[2]  M. Delibes,et al.  Using historical accounts to set conservation baselines: the case of Lynx species in Spain , 2013, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[3]  Kristen Mastel,et al.  Resurfacing Historical Scientific Data: A Case Study Involving Fruit Breeding Data , 2019 .

[4]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[5]  K. Gross,et al.  Final Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Future of Long-term Ecological Data (FLED). Volume II: Directories to Sources of Long-Term Ecological Data , 1995 .

[6]  A. Bidlack,et al.  100 years of primary succession highlights stochasticity and competition driving community establishment and stability. , 2019, Ecology.

[7]  R. Elizabeth Griffin,et al.  When are Old Data New Data , 2015 .

[8]  D. Pauly,et al.  Using harmonized historical catch data to infer the expansion of global tuna fisheries , 2020 .

[9]  Charlotte Maday,et al.  Records management for scientific data , 2014 .

[10]  M. Bosilovich,et al.  On the Reprocessing and Reanalysis of Observations for Climate , 2013 .

[11]  Xiongwen Chen Dynamics of forest composition and growth in Alabama of USA under human activities and climate fluctuation , 2018, Journal of Sustainable Forestry.

[12]  N. Mandrak,et al.  Historical changes in the fish communities of the Credit River watershed , 2017, Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management.

[13]  S. McGowan,et al.  Humans and climate as drivers of algal community change in Windermere since 1850 , 2012 .

[14]  B. Bessant Lessons from the past: Lessons for the future , 1996 .

[15]  Matthew S. Mayernik,et al.  Risk Assessment for Scientific Data , 2020 .

[16]  M. Bürgi,et al.  Evaluating a forest conservation plan with historical vegetation data: a transdisciplinary case study from the Swiss lowlands. , 2010 .