The Ecological Footprint: an Indicator of Progress Toward Regional Sustainability

We define regional sustainability as the continuous support of human quality of life within a region's ecological carrying capacity. To achieve regional sustainability, one must first assess the current situation. That is, indicators of status and progress are required. The ecological footprint is an area-based indicator which quantifies the intensity of human resource use and waste discharge activity in relation to a region's ecological carrying capacity. If the ecological footprint of a human population is greater than the area which it occupies, the population must be doing at least one of the following: receiving resources from elsewhere, disposing of some of its waste outside of the area, or depleting the area's natural capital stocks. To achieve global sustainability, the sum of all regional footprints must not exceed the total area of the biosphere. This paper explains the mechanics of a footprint calculation method for nations and regions. As the method is standardized, the relative ecological load imposed by nations and regions can be compared. Further, a nation's or region's consumption can be contrasted with its local ecological production, providing an indicator of potential vulnerability and contribution to ecological decline.

[1]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  How Many People Can the Earth Support , 1998 .

[2]  Jorge L. Sarmiento,et al.  Oceanic Carbon Dioxide Uptake in a Model of Century-Scale Global Warming , 1996, Science.

[3]  G. Sidhu,et al.  Genetics of Plant and Animal Parasitic Systems , 1984 .

[4]  David Pimentel,et al.  Water Resources: Agriculture, the Environment, and Society , 1997 .

[5]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[6]  Anne Simon Moffat,et al.  Resurgent Forests Can Be Greenhouse Gas Sponges , 1997, Science.

[7]  D. Janzen.  The Carbon Crop , 1997 .

[8]  H. Odum,et al.  Primary Productivity of the Biosphere , 1978, Ecological Studies.

[9]  Faye Duchin,et al.  The Future of the Environment: Ecological Economics and Technological Change , 1995 .

[10]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Human population and the global environment. , 1974, American scientist.

[11]  Banco Mundial,et al.  World Resources 1996-97 , 1996 .

[12]  D. Meadows,et al.  Beyond the Limits , 1992 .

[13]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting And Restoring Biodiversity , 1994 .

[14]  W. Rees.  Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability , 1996 .

[15]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[16]  D. Campbell.  Emergy Analysis of Human Carrying Capacity and Regional Sustainability: an Example Using the State of Maine , 1998 .

[17]  R. Whittaker.  Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[18]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[19]  Jae-Young Ko,et al.  Resource use rates and efficiency as indicators of regional sustainability : An examination of five countries , 1998 .

[20]  M. Borowitzka.  Limits to Growth , 1998 .

[21]  W. Rosenbaum,et al.  Environmental politics and policy , 1985 .

[22]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[23]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  HUMAN APPROPRIATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[24]  G. Gallopin,et al.  Branch Points: Global Scenarios and Human Choice , 1997 .

[25]  Michael Narodoslawsky,et al.  The Sustainable Process Index a new dimension in ecological evaluation , 1996 .