Retinotopic and topographic analyses with gaze restriction for steady-state visual evoked potentials

Although the mechanisms of steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) have been well studied, none of them have been implemented with strictly experimental conditions. Our objective was to create an ideal observer condition to exploit the features of SSVEPs. We present here an electroencephalographic (EEG) eye tracking experimental paradigm that provides biofeedback for gaze restriction during the visual stimulation. Specifically, we designed an EEG eye tracking synchronous data recording system for successful trial selection. Forty-six periodic flickers within a visual field of 11.5° were successively presented to evoke SSVEP responses, and online biofeedback based on an eye tracker was provided for gaze restriction. For eight participants, SSVEP responses in the visual field and topographic maps from full-brain EEG were plotted and analyzed. The experimental results indicated that the optimal visual flicking arrangement to boost SSVEPs should include the features of circular stimuli within a 4–6° spatial distance and increased stimulus area below the fixation point. These findings provide a basis for determining stimulus parameters for neural engineering studies, e.g. SSVEP-based brain-computer interface (BCI) designs. The proposed experimental paradigm could also provide a precise framework for future SSVEP-related studies.

[1]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Visual and Auditory Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency recognition based on canonical correlation analysis for SSVEP-based BCIs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Xueyuan Xu,et al.  The Use of Multivariate EMD and CCA for Denoising Muscle Artifacts From Few-Channel EEG Recordings , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  Yang Yu,et al.  A Dynamically Optimized SSVEP Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) Speller , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Xiaogang Chen,et al.  A novel stimulation method for multi-class SSVEP-BCI using intermodulation frequencies , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  An objective method for measuring face detection thresholds using the sweep steady-state visual evoked response. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[7]  Hedderik van Rijn,et al.  Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2014, NeuroImage.

[8]  Alexander Maye,et al.  Utilizing Retinotopic Mapping for a Multi-Target SSVEP BCI With a Single Flicker Frequency , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  A. Engel,et al.  An independent brain–computer interface using covert non-spatial visual selective attention , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain–computer interface , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Fanglin Chen,et al.  A novel hybrid BCI speller based on the incorporation of SSVEP into the P300 paradigm , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[14]  Prashant Parikh.  A Theory of Communication , 2010 .

[15]  J. Masdeu,et al.  Human Cerebral Activation during Steady-State Visual-Evoked Responses , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[17]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  A four-choice hybrid P300/SSVEP BCI for improved accuracy , 2014 .

[18]  Annabelle Blangero,et al.  Exploiting individual primary visual cortex geometry to boost steady state visual evoked potentials , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interface systems: progress and prospects , 2007, Expert review of medical devices.

[20]  J. Daugman.  Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  Xiaogang Chen,et al.  A Benchmark Dataset for SSVEP-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[25]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Evaluating the feasibility of the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) to study temporal attention. , 2018, Psychophysiology.

[26]  C. Johnson.  Progress and Prospects , 1991 .

[27]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses , 1994 .

[28]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A BCI-based environmental controller for the motion-disabled. , 2003, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Fanglin Chen,et al.  A Speedy Hybrid BCI Spelling Approach Combining P300 and SSVEP , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Yuanjin Zheng,et al.  Coherent Photoacoustic-Ultrasound Correlation and Imaging , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  H Chakroun,et al.  Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials in depressed patients and healthy controls. , 1988, Acta psychiatrica Belgica.

[33]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Piotr Milanowski,et al.  Towards an Optimization of Stimulus Parameters for Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Enhancing Detection of SSVEPs for a High-Speed Brain Speller Using Task-Related Component Analysis , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Phases of daylight and the stability of color perception in the near peripheral human retina. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[37]  Anja Vogler,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2004 .

[38]  Ross Cunnington,et al.  Stimulus specificity of a steady-state visual-evoked potential-based brain–computer interface , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[39]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Fast detection of covert visuospatial attention using hybrid N2pc and SSVEP features. , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.