Numerical simulations of Jupiter's moist convection layer: Structure and dynamics in statistically steady states

Abstract A series of long-term numerical simulations of moist convection in Jupiter’s atmosphere is performed in order to investigate the idealized characteristics of the vertical structure of multi-composition clouds and the convective motions associated with them, varying the deep abundances of condensable gases and the autoconversion time scale, the latter being one of the most questionable parameters in cloud microphysical parameterization. The simulations are conducted using a two-dimensional cloud resolving model that explicitly represents the convective motion and microphysics of the three cloud components, H 2 O, NH 3 , and NH 4 SH imposing a body cooling that substitutes the net radiative cooling. The results are qualitatively similar to those reported in Sugiyama et al. (Sugiyama, K. et al. [2011]. Intermittent cumulonimbus activity breaking the three-layer cloud structure of Jupiter. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L13201. doi:10.1029/2011GL047878): stable layers associated with condensation and chemical reaction act as effective dynamical and compositional boundaries, intense cumulonimbus clouds develop with distinct temporal intermittency, and the active transport associated with these clouds results in the establishment of mean vertical profiles of condensates and condensable gases that are distinctly different from the hitherto accepted three-layered structure (e.g., Atreya, S.K., Romani, P.N. [1985]. Photochemistry and clouds of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus. In: Recent Advances in Planetary Meteorology. Cambridge Univ. Press, London, pp. 17–68). Our results also demonstrate that the period of intermittent cloud activity is roughly proportional to the deep abundance of H 2 O gas. The autoconversion time scale does not strongly affect the results, except for the vertical profiles of the condensates. Changing the autoconversion time scale by a factor of 100 changes the intermittency period by a factor of less than two, although it causes a dramatic increase in the amount of condensates in the upper troposphere. The moist convection layer becomes potentially unstable with respect to an air parcel rising from below the H 2 O lifting condensation level (LCL) well before the development of cumulonimbus clouds. The instability accumulates until an appropriate trigger is provided by the H 2 O condensate that falls down through the H 2 O LCL; the H 2 O condensate drives a downward flow below the H 2 O LCL as a result of the latent cooling associated with the re-evaporation of the condensate, and the returning updrafts carry moist air from below to the moist convection layer. Active cloud development is terminated when the instability is completely exhausted. The period of intermittency is roughly equal to the time obtained by dividing the mean temperature increase, which is caused by active cumulonimbus development, by the body cooling rate.

[1]  Ashwin R. Vasavada,et al.  Galileo Images of Lightning on Jupiter , 1999 .

[2]  C. Stoker.  Moist convection: A mechanism for producing the vertical structure of the Jovian Equatorial Plumes , 1986 .

[3]  W. Welch,et al.  Accurate jovian radio flux density measurements show ammonia to be subsaturated in the upper troposphere , 2005 .

[4]  Daniel Gautier,et al.  Enrichment in volatiles in the giant planets of the Solar System , 2004 .

[5]  Leigh N. Fletcher,et al.  Jovian temperature and cloud variability during the 2009-2010 fade of the South Equatorial Belt , 2011, 1701.00957.

[6]  Z. Levin,et al.  Microphysical Processes and Dynamics of a Jovian Thundercloud , 1995 .

[7]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Static stability of the Jovian atmospheres estimated from moist adiabatic profiles , 2006 .

[8]  R. West,et al.  Lightning on Jupiter observed in the Hα line by the Cassini imaging science subsystem , 2004 .

[9]  P. Gierasch,et al.  A Detection of Water Ice on Jupiter with Voyager IRIS , 2000 .

[10]  J. Klemp,et al.  The Simulation of Three-Dimensional Convective Storm Dynamics , 1978 .

[11]  Ashwin R. Vasavada,et al.  Jovian atmospheric dynamics: an update after Galileo and Cassini , 2005 .

[12]  W. Rossow.  Cloud microphysics: Analysis of the clouds of Earth, Venus, Mars and Jupiter , 1978 .

[13]  R. Hueso,et al.  Depth of a strong jovian jet from a planetary-scale disturbance driven by storms , 2008, Nature.

[14]  T. Dowling,et al.  Nonlinear simulations of Jupiter's 5-micron hot spots. , 2000, Science.

[15]  M. Asplund,et al.  The Solar Chemical Composition , 2007 .

[16]  T. Dowling,et al.  Addition of water and ammonia cloud microphysics to the EPIC model , 2008 .

[17]  M. Tomasko,et al.  Clouds, aerosols, and photochemistry in the Jovian atmosphere , 1986 .

[18]  JOHN S. Lewis,et al.  Atmospheric and cloud structures of the Jovian planets , 1973 .

[19]  A. Friedson.  Water, ammonia, and H2S mixing ratios in Jupiter's five-micron hot spots: A dynamical model , 2005 .

[20]  M. Lemmon,et al.  Galileo probe measurements of thermal and solar radiation fluxes in the Jovian atmosphere , 1998 .

[21]  S. Atreya,et al.  Photochemistry and clouds of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus , 1985 .

[22]  J. Lunine,et al.  Generation of lightning in Jupiter's water cloud , 1995, Nature.

[23]  T. Encrenaz,et al.  A comparison of the atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn: deep atmospheric composition, cloud structure, vertical mixing, and origin. , 1999, Planetary and space science.

[24]  C. C. Porco,et al.  A giant thunderstorm on Saturn , 2011, Nature.

[25]  N. Grevesse,et al.  Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar , 1989 .

[26]  J. Lunine,et al.  Enrichments in Volatiles in Jupiter: A New Interpretation of the Galileo Measurements , 2001 .

[27]  Model interpretation of Jovian lightning activity and the Galileo Probe results , 1998 .

[28]  L. Sromovsky,et al.  The source of 3-μm absorption in Jupiter’s clouds: Reanalysis of ISO observations using new NH3 absorption models , 2010 .

[29]  B. Carlson,et al.  Cloud Microphysics of the Giant Planets , 1988 .

[30]  I. Pater,et al.  Reconciling Galileo Probe Data and Ground-Based Radio Observations of Ammonia on Jupiter , 2001 .

[31]  Kensuke Nakajima,et al.  Numerical Experiments Concerning the Origin of Cloud Clusters in the Tropical Atmosphere , 1988 .

[32]  Z. Levin,et al.  Water—cumulus in Jupiter's atmosphere: Numerical experiments with an axisymmetric cloud model , 1992 .

[33]  Y. Hayashi,et al.  Intermittent cumulonimbus activity breaking the three‐layer cloud structure of Jupiter , 2011 .

[34]  A. Vasavada,et al.  Life cycles of spots on Jupiter from Cassini images , 2004 .

[35]  I. Pater,et al.  Dynamical implications of Jupiter's tropospheric ammonia abundance , 2005 .

[36]  E. Kessler.  On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations , 1969 .

[37]  T. Owen,et al.  Updated Galileo probe mass spectrometer measurements of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur on Jupiter , 2004 .

[38]  Masaki Ishiwatari,et al.  Numerical modeling of Jupiter's moist convection layer , 2000 .

[39]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Waves from the collisions of comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 with Jupiter , 1995, Nature.

[40]  J. Rogers,et al.  The giant planet Jupiter , 1995 .

[41]  Galileo Imaging Team,et al.  Observation of moist convection in Jupiter's atmosphere , 2000, Nature.

[42]  B. Conrath,et al.  Albedo, internal heat, and energy balance of Jupiter: Preliminary results of the Voyager Infrared Investigation , 1980 .

[43]  R. Hueso,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Model of Moist Convection for the Giant Planets: The Jupiter Case , 2001 .