Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study.

OBJECTIVE In 1986 a prospective multicenter observation trial in patients with resected gastric cancer was initiated in Germany. An analysis of prognostic factors based on the 10-year survival data is now presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1654 patients treated for gastric cancer between 1986 and 1989 at 19 centers in Germany and Austria were included. The resected specimen were evaluated histopathologically according to a standardized protocol. The extent of lymphadenectomy was classified after surgery based on the number of removed lymph nodes on histopathologic assessment (25 or fewer removed nodes, D1 or standard lymphadenectomy; >25 removed nodes, D2 or extended lymphadenectomy). Endpoint of the study was death. Follow-up is complete for 97% of the included patients (median follow-up of the surviving patients is 8.4 years). Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS A complete macroscopic and microscopic tumor resection (R0 resection according to the UICC 1997) could be achieved in 1182 of the 1654 patients (71.5%). The calculated 10-year survival rate in the entire patient population was 26.3% +/- 4.7%; it was 36.1% +/- 1.6% after an R0 resection. In the total patient population there was an independent prognostic effect of the ratio between invaded and removed lymph nodes, the residual tumor (R) category, the pT category, the presence of postsurgical complications, and the presence of distant metastases. Multivariate analysis in the subgroup of patients who had a UICC R0 resection confirmed the nodal status, the pT category, and the presence of postsurgical complications as the major independent prognostic factors. The extent of lymph node dissection had a significant and independent effect on the 10-year survival rate in patients with stage II tumors. This effect was present in the subgroups with (pT2N1) and without (pT3N0) lymph node metastases on standard histopathologic assessment. The beneficial effect of extended lymph node dissection for stage II tumors persisted when patients with insufficient lymph node dissection (<15 nodes) were excluded from the analysis. There was no difference in the postsurgical morbidity and mortality rates between patients with standard and extended lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS Lymph node ratio and lymph node status are the most important prognostic factors in patients with resected gastric cancer. In experienced centers, extended lymph node dissection does not increase the mortality or morbidity rate of resection for gastric cancer but markedly improves long-term survival in patients with stage II tumors. This effect appears to be independent of the phenomenon of stage migration.

[1]  M. Brennan Lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  P. Hermanek,et al.  Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[3]  M. Sasako Risk factors for surgical treatment in the Dutch gastric cancer trial , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  H. Höfler,et al.  Benefits of D2 lymph node dissection for patients with gastric cancer and pN0 and pN1 lymph node metastases , 1996 .

[5]  A. Encke,et al.  A prospective randomized trial comparing R1 subtotal gastrectomy with R3 total gastrectomy for antral cancer. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[6]  P. Fayers,et al.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial , 1996, The Lancet.

[7]  C. V. D. van de Velde,et al.  Lymph node staging standards in gastric cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  J. Hermans,et al.  Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients , 1995, The Lancet.

[9]  A. Li,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing R1 Subtotal Gastrectomy with R3 Total Gastrectomy for Antral Cancer , 1994, Annals of surgery.

[10]  J. Siewert,et al.  Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  R. Moorehead One‐layer continuously sutured colonic anastomosis , 1994 .

[12]  J. Chmiel,et al.  Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[13]  J. Siewert,et al.  Prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma. Results of the German gastric carcinoma study 1992 , 1993, Cancer.

[14]  E. Bollschweiler,et al.  Is the prognosis for Japanese and German patients with gastric cancer really different? , 1993, Cancer.

[15]  K. Becker,et al.  [Prognostic factors in stomach cancer. Results of a uni- and multivariate analysis]. , 1992, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[16]  E. Burns,et al.  Lymphadenectomy in Gastric Carcinoma: A Prospective and Prognostic Study , 1992 .

[17]  M. Rothmund,et al.  Lymph node counts in the upper abdomen: Anatomical basis for lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer , 1991, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  K. Hioki,et al.  Quantitative analysis of nodal involvement with respect to survival rate after curative gastrectomy for carcinoma. , 1990, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[19]  M. Sasako,et al.  Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients. , 1989, Annals of surgery.

[20]  C. McConkey,et al.  Gastric cancer: A 25‐year review , 1989, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  T. Nakajima,et al.  [Prognostic factors in gastric cancer]. , 1988, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[22]  D. Dent,et al.  Randomized comparison of R1 and R2 gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma , 1988, The British journal of surgery.

[23]  M. Brennan,et al.  Influence of the extent of resection on survival after curative treatment of gastric carcinoma. A retrospective multivariate analysis. , 1987, Archives of surgery.

[24]  A R Feinstein,et al.  The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Ron Brookmeyer,et al.  A Confidence Interval for the Median Survival Time , 1982 .

[26]  Tanaki Kajitani,et al.  The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology , 1981, The Japanese journal of surgery.

[27]  P. Laurén,et al.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION. , 1965, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica.

[28]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[29]  M. Sobrinho-Simões,et al.  Prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  H. Espejo,et al.  [Gastric cancer]. , 1996, Revista de gastroenterologia del Peru : organo oficial de la Sociedad de Gastroenterologia del Peru.

[31]  S. Thorban,et al.  Prognosefaktoren beim Magenkarzinom. Ergebnisse einer uni- und multivariaten Analyse , 1992 .

[32]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .