Optimization of 3-Dimensional Imaging of the Breast Region With 3-Dimensional Laser Scanners

The anatomic conditions of the female breast require imaging the breast region 3-dimensionally in a normal standing position for quality assurance and for surgery planning or surgery simulation. The goal of this work was to optimize the imaging technology for the mammary region with a 3-dimensional (3D) laser scanner, to evaluate the precision and accuracy of the method, and to allow optimum data reproducibility. Avoiding the influence of biotic factors, such as mobility, we tested the most favorable imaging technology on dummy models for scanner-related factors such as the scanner position in comparison with the torso and the number of scanners and single shots. The influence of different factors of the breast region, such as different breast shapes or premarking of anatomic landmarks, was also first investigated on dummies. The findings from the dummy models were then compared with investigations on test persons, and the accuracy of measurements on the virtual models was compared with a coincidence analysis of the manually measured values. The best precision and accuracy of breast region measurements were achieved when landmarks were marked before taking the shots and when shots at 30 degrees left and 30 degrees right, relative to the sagittal line, were taken with 2 connected scanners mounted with a +10-degree upward angle. However, the precision of the measurements on test persons was significantly lower than those measured on dummies. Our findings show that the correct settings for 3D imaging of the breast region with a laser scanner can achieve an acceptable degree of accuracy and reproducibility.

[1]  D L Hill,et al.  Evaluation of a laser scanner for surface topography. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[2]  Laszlo Kovacs,et al.  Re: factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. , 2004, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  Don-Hee Han,et al.  Development of prototypes of half-mask facepieces for Koreans using the 3D digitizing design method: a pilot study. , 2004, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  M. Wickman,et al.  Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[5]  S. C. Aung,et al.  Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. , 1995, British journal of plastic surgery.

[6]  K. Bush,et al.  Three-dimensional facial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner: validation of the technique. , 1996, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  C H Kau,et al.  The feasibility of measuring three-dimensional facial morphology in children. , 2004, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[8]  M Kouchi,et al.  Random errors in anthropometry. , 1996, Journal of human ergology.

[9]  A F Ayoub,et al.  Assessment of the Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional Imaging System for Archiving Dental Study Models , 2003, Journal of orthodontics.

[10]  Maximilian Eder,et al.  Validating 3-dimensional imaging of the breast. , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[11]  B. Kusnoto,et al.  Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  Albert Losken,et al.  Validating Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Breast , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[13]  N. Scuderi,et al.  Breast asymmetry: a new vision of this malformation. , 2004, Acta chirurgiae plasticae.

[14]  M Westreich,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  Michael Chiaramonte,et al.  Clinical Applications of Three‐Dimensional Photography in Breast Surgery , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  Richard O. Lynch,et al.  Introduction to Design and Analysis of Experiments , 1999, Technometrics.

[17]  M. Kurtay,et al.  A formula for surgical modifications of the breast. , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  D. Hudson,et al.  Factors Determining Shape and Symmetry in Immediate Breast Reconstruction , 2004, Annals of plastic surgery.

[19]  E Tezel,et al.  Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  Maurice Y Nahabedian,et al.  Symmetrical Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Role for Three-Dimensional Digital Photography? , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  R E Hyland,et al.  A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application. , 1999, British journal of plastic surgery.

[22]  J. Carlson,et al.  Measurement of Breast Implant Volume with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1995, Annals of plastic surgery.

[23]  M F Huque,et al.  Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  V L Katch,et al.  Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. , 1979, Annals of human biology.