What makes the first forward citation of a patent occur earlier?

Identifying the economic value of a patent is crucial to technology management. It also facilitates the commercialization and transactions of patents. As a proxy of patent value, forward citation counting is widely used, but it takes a long time for a patent to be sufficiently cited. In this context, we suggest the first citation lag, namely the time taken until the first citation, as a proxy of patent value, as it is positively correlated with the patent value and considers the fact that important patents with a high economic value tend to receive many citations in a short space of time. We explore the influential patent attributes related to the first citation lag to build a model to predict the patent value. By using the Cox proportional hazard model on green inventory patent data, we find that patents with a shorter technology cycle time and a larger number of IPC four-digit classes, claims, patent family, and backward citations are associated with the shorter first citation lag, while a patent’s science linkage has an inverse U-shaped relationship with the first citation lag. Further, patents having an unconventional technological core have a longer first citation lag and among patents having an unconventional technological core, the presence of a novel element makes the first citation earlier. Our study is expected to help patent evaluation in the early stage of technology transfer.

[1]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[2]  Francis Narin,et al.  Citation rates to technologically important patents , 1981 .

[3]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Predicting links in ego-networks using temporal information , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[4]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Y. Lee The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment , 2000 .

[7]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[8]  G. Duysters,et al.  The technological origins of radical inventions , 2010 .

[9]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  AS A SOURCE OF COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY : A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY PATENTING , 1965 – 1988 , 1995 .

[10]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[11]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[12]  George Mason,et al.  Worthless Patents , 2013 .

[13]  Christian Fisch,et al.  The value of Chinese patents: An empirical investigation of citation lags , 2017 .

[14]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Organisation of science and technology at the watershed : the academic and industrial perspective , 1996 .

[15]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value , 2006 .

[16]  F. Narin,et al.  Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance , 1999 .

[17]  Valerio Sterzi,et al.  Patent quality and ownership: an analysis of UK Faculty patenting , 2013 .

[18]  R. Katila New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[19]  M. Lange,et al.  Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development , 2007 .

[20]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  Claiming More: The Increased Voluminosity of Patent Applications and its Determinants , 2006 .

[21]  R. T. Alexander,et al.  Internal sequential innovations: How does interrelatedness affect patent renewal? , 2008 .

[22]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  The dynamics of correlated novelties , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[23]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[24]  Béatrice Dumont,et al.  Patent Renewals as Options: Improving the Mechanism for Weeding Out Lousy Patents , 2006 .

[25]  J. Davidson Frame,et al.  Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data , 1994 .

[26]  Daniel Kim,et al.  Technological novelty profile and invention’s future impact , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[27]  R. S. Campbell,et al.  Patent trends as a technological forecasting tool , 1983 .

[28]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Conjoint analysis of R&D contract agreements for industry-funded university research , 2012 .

[29]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions , 2012 .

[30]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[31]  R. Nelson,et al.  On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope , 1990 .

[32]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[33]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Determinants of Patent Citations in Biotechnology: An Analysis of Patent Influence Across the Industrial and Organizational Boundaries , 2014, ArXiv.

[34]  L. Fleming Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[35]  Michel Callon,et al.  The state and technical innovation: a case study of the electrical vehicle in France☆ , 1980 .

[36]  Alan C. Marco The Dynamics of Patent Citations , 2007 .

[37]  Raffaele Oriani,et al.  The Economic Valuation of Patents: Methods and Applications , 2011 .

[38]  H. Etzkowitz The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[39]  Antonio Capaldo,et al.  Knowledge Maturity and the Scientific Value of Innovations , 2017 .

[40]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[41]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[42]  A. Gambardella Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[43]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[44]  Bhaven N. Sampat,et al.  PRIVATE PARTS: PATENTS AND ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY , 2003 .

[45]  Rebecca S Eisenberg,et al.  Public vs. Proprietary Science: A Fruitful Tension? , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[46]  Olivier Sénéchal,et al.  Innovation management: a synthesis of academic and industrial points of view , 2004 .

[47]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Stylised Fact of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership , 1997 .

[48]  Mary Crossan,et al.  Connecting external knowledge usage and firm performance: An empirical analysis , 2011 .

[49]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[50]  V. K. Gupta,et al.  References to literature in patent documents: A case study of CSIR in India , 2006, Scientometrics.

[51]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis , 2014 .

[52]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition , 2001 .

[53]  J. Lerner The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[54]  M. Reitzig Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales , 2004 .

[55]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[56]  P. Patel,et al.  The determinants of patent citations: an empirical analysis of French and British patents in the US , 2005 .

[57]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[58]  Faridah Hassan,et al.  Intangible assets valuation in the Malaysian capital market , 2010 .

[59]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Modelling the Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent citations, patent share and relative patent position on market value in the US pharmaceutical industry , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[61]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[62]  Petr Hanel,et al.  Industry–University Collaboration by Canadian Manufacturing Firms* , 2006 .

[63]  Christopher Hubert Llewellyn Smith What's the use of basic science? , 1997 .

[64]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[65]  Szu-chia S. Lo,et al.  Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: a case of genetic engineering research , 2009, Scientometrics.

[66]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[67]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[68]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[69]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  Academic Inventors, Technological Profiles and Patent Value: An Analysis of Academic Patents Owned by Swedish-Based Firms , 2013 .

[70]  Eun Jin Patent valuation based on text mining and survival analysis , 2015 .

[71]  Charlotta Grönqvist The private value of patents by patent characteristics: evidence from Finland , 2009 .

[72]  P. Thomas The Effect of Technological Impact upon Patent Renewal Decisions , 1999 .

[73]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  A new instrument for technology monitoring: novelty in patents measured by semantic patent analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[74]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  Defining multi-tenancy: A systematic mapping study on the academic and the industrial perspective , 2015, J. Syst. Softw..

[75]  Zan Huang,et al.  Longitudinal Patent Analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, Institution and Technology Field , 2003 .

[76]  Sadao Nagaoka,et al.  Assessing the R&D Management of a Firm in Terms of Speed and Science Linkage: Evidence from the U.S. Patents , 2007 .

[77]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[78]  Jasjit Singh Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[79]  Dimitris Papanikolaou,et al.  Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth (No. w17769). National Bureau of Economic Research. , 2012 .

[80]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[81]  Lukasz A. Kurgan,et al.  Discovery of factors influencing patent value based on machine learning in patents in the field of nanotechnology , 2009, Scientometrics.

[82]  Albert B. Schwarzkopf,et al.  A study of innovation in the pesticide industry: Analysis of the innovation record of an industrial sector , 1987 .

[83]  M. Assink Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model , 2006 .

[84]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The Economics of the European Patent System , 2007 .

[85]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[86]  M. Reitzig What determines patent value?: Insights from the semiconductor industry , 2003 .

[87]  Timo Fischer,et al.  Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value—An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions , 2014 .

[88]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation , 1998 .

[89]  Lopez Zapata,et al.  Intangible assets valuation , 2009 .