Teleologies: Objects, Actions and Functions

We start from the observation that the notion of concept, as it is used in perception, is distinct and different from the notion of concept, as it is used in knowledge representation. In earlier work we called the first notion, substance concept and the second, classification concept. In this paper we integrate these two notions into a general theory of concepts that organizes them into a hierarchy of increasing abstraction from what is perceived. Thus, at the first level, we have objects (which roughly correspond to substance concepts), which represent what is perceived (e.g., a car); at the second level we have actions, which represent how objects change in time (e.g., move); while, at the third level, we have functions (which roughly correspond to classification concepts), which represent the expected behavior of objects as it is manifested in terms of “an object performing a certain set of actions” (e.g., a vehicle). The main outcome is the notion of Teleology, where teleologies provide the basis for a solution to the problem of the integration of perception and reasoning and, more in general, to the problem of managing the diversity of knowledge.

[1]  David Papineau,et al.  Causal Factors, Causal Inference, Causal Explanation , 1986 .

[2]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Qin Ni,et al.  A foundational ontology-based model for human activity representation in smart homes , 2016, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[4]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  A Theory of Abstraction , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[5]  R. Millikan On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay about Substance Concepts , 2000 .

[6]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Concepts as (Recognition) Abilities , 2016, FOIS.

[7]  Fausto Giunchiglia Managing Diversity in Knowledge , 2006, IEA/AIE.

[8]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Understanding and Exploiting Language Diversity , 2017, IJCAI.

[9]  Jesse J. Prinz,et al.  Beyond Appearances: The Content of Sensation and Perception , 2007 .

[10]  Manuel P. Cuéllar,et al.  A survey on ontologies for human behavior recognition , 2014, ACM Comput. Surv..

[11]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Computer Vision: A Modern Approach , 2002 .

[12]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Affordances as Qualities , 2010, FOIS.

[13]  Maya Cakmak,et al.  To Afford or Not to Afford: A New Formalization of Affordances Toward Affordance-Based Robot Control , 2007, Adapt. Behav..

[14]  J. J. Gibson The theory of affordances , 1977 .

[15]  Adam Pease,et al.  Towards a standard upper ontology , 2001, FOIS.

[16]  R. Millikan Varieties of Meaning: The 2002 Jean Nicod Lectures , 2004 .

[17]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  A Knowledge-Driven Approach to Activity Recognition in Smart Homes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[18]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.