Network Features of the EU Carbon Trade System: An Evolutionary Perspective

In this paper, a network model is constructed using real trading data from the EU carbon market. Metric indicators are then introduced to measure the network, and the economic meanings of the indicators are discussed. By integrating time windows with the network model, three types of network features are examined: growth features, structural features, and scale-free features. The growth pattern of the carbon trading network is then analyzed. As the market grow, the geodesic distances become shorter and the clustering coefficients become larger. The trends of these two indicators suggest that the market is evolving towards efficiency; however, their tiny changes are insufficient to have significant impact. By modeling the heterogeneity of the carbon trading network, we find that the trading relationships between firms obey a broken power law model, which consists of two power law models. The broken power law model can be approximately defined as a traditional power law but with a longer tail in distribution. Furthermore, we find that the model is valid for most of the time of both phases, the model only invalid when the market approaches a high growth rate.

[1]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[3]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[4]  V. Muggeo Estimating regression models with unknown break‐points , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Gunnlaugur Bjornsson,et al.  Afterglow Light Curves and Broken Power Laws: A Statistical Study , 2006 .

[6]  H. Bauke Parameter estimation for power-law distributions by maximum likelihood methods , 2007, 0704.1867.

[7]  M. Muggeo,et al.  segmented: An R package to Fit Regression Models with Broken-Line Relationships , 2008 .

[8]  Stefan Trück,et al.  Modeling the Price Dynamics of Co2 Emission Allowances , 2009 .

[9]  C. Perthuis,et al.  Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme , 2010 .

[10]  Christian Conrad,et al.  Modeling and Explaining the Dynamics of European Union Allowance Prices at High-Frequency , 2010 .

[11]  Yogesh Virkar,et al.  Power-law distributions in binned empirical data , 2012, 1208.3524.

[12]  Aleksandar Zaklan,et al.  Why Do Emitters Trade Carbon Permits? Firm-Level Evidence from the European Emission Trading Scheme , 2013 .

[13]  K. Choromanski,et al.  Scale-Free Graph with Preferential Attachment and Evolving Internal Vertex Structure , 2013 .

[14]  Bruce Mizrach,et al.  The Market Microstructure of the European Climate Exchange , 2013 .

[15]  Danièle Revel,et al.  Back to the future: A comprehensive analysis of carbon transactions in Phase 1 of the EU ETS , 2013 .

[16]  E. Roca,et al.  Is the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) informationally efficient? Evidence from momentum-based trading strategies , 2013 .

[17]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Firm Competitiveness and the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme , 2012 .

[18]  James Bushnell,et al.  Profiting from Regulation: Evidence from the European Carbon Market , 2013 .

[19]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? - New evidence , 2014 .

[20]  Ilias Tsiakas,et al.  Carbon Emissions and Stock Returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme , 2015 .

[21]  Ming Xu,et al.  Structure of the Global Virtual Carbon Network: Revealing Important Sectors and Communities for Emission Reduction , 2015 .

[22]  Anca Balietti,et al.  Trader types and volatility of emission allowance prices. Evidence from EU ETS Phase I , 2016 .

[23]  Dongyun Yi,et al.  The degree-related clustering coefficient and its application to link prediction , 2016 .

[24]  Ying Fan,et al.  How to explain carbon price using market micro-behaviour? , 2016 .

[25]  Ying Fan,et al.  A big data study on emitting companies' performance in the first two phases of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme , 2017 .

[26]  Xiangyun Gao,et al.  The stability of the international oil trade network from short-term and long-term perspectives , 2017 .

[27]  Laura Sacerdote,et al.  Scale-free behavior of networks with the copresence of preferential and uniform attachment rules , 2017, 1704.08597.

[28]  Ricardo Lopes de Andrade,et al.  The use of nodes attributes in social network analysis with an application to an international trade network , 2018 .

[29]  Yong Geng,et al.  Trends and features of embodied flows associated with international trade based on bibliometric analysis , 2018 .